From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Nqe7w-0004de-A7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:04:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2513E09B5 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 03:04:27 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-iw0-f191.google.com (mail-iw0-f191.google.com [209.85.223.191]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1AC93E0887 for ; Sun, 14 Mar 2010 02:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: by iwn29 with SMTP id 29so1227222iwn.10 for ; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:56:57 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=OgpBsf2w6RFanuNrWgA4wCII7RzWSLDhqo13A6n9heI=; b=SMtVR0oWBQmT3JlGnsP/M3JVP0ElEO+AVmRRTTMvkD4Q4JfVnqabCf0VP+MvC6qhpq Jf+yzO0YIqnK7gmVqx8CFUnjRyP70/tExFQ1wd+dBzqAS3kmst9X5jXR7x1NHD3plitM RjHq3XRBg2QW63dnFW7POFDCl9QQ7QRfuGH2k= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=KQaYAza57oGmVMei9zlwJ35GmGRKYkukumHSPaV259NBPl53hrItIXoZGR4AFW5EbM gCI7XbzeYTdVq32Eci2ceR+6wFw9vSMo9zLZSrO2HrvoJlR4D8EILZ67uS4pFuX4EKkB Uq8ZOKIEAHXQzEVKvHPgrQDKQ4CV37Xi9RX8E= Received: by 10.231.152.79 with SMTP id f15mr907078ibw.19.1268535417846; Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:56:57 -0800 (PST) Received: from localhost.localdomain ([120.18.199.112]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 21sm2561254iwn.11.2010.03.13.18.56.55 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 13 Mar 2010 18:56:57 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B9C5084.5000501@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 14 Mar 2010 10:57:08 +0800 From: ubiquitous1980 User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20100223) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Compiz effects vs kwin References: <4B9C3376.60004@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 24fb21aa-46b2-40f9-9209-f83cf86e46d3 X-Archives-Hash: 24e9e434c6e56ec3fdeb2ac83ac54e32 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 03/14/2010 02:53 AM, ubiquitous1980 wrote: >> The effects in kwin (such as window wobble) are vastly less smooth than >> that in compiz. I have noticed that compiz is faster in both kde4 and >> in gnome (with slight preference to gnome in speed) and wondering if >> this is normal, or something to do with my kwin setup. Running on GM >> 965 > > kwin got crappy animation speed in KDE 4.4. It was as smooth as > compiz in 4.3. I asked about it in the KDE mailing list, but there > was zero interest in this regression. So you either have to live with > it, or switch to compiz. > > Thanks for your reply. I am currently using kde 4.3 because I try only to update to downstream-stable. Is there another explanation? Thanks, Damien