From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NpkbP-0002FA-2s for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:47:11 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CD083E08BE; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from blingymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (caibbdcaaaaf.dreamhost.com [208.113.200.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9CBEFE08BE for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 15:46:09 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.1.110] (smtp.media-brokers.com [70.43.81.99]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by blingymail-a1.g.dreamhost.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id BD7005CDDE for ; Thu, 11 Mar 2010 07:46:08 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4B99103F.9020107@libertytrek.org> Date: Thu, 11 Mar 2010 10:46:07 -0500 From: Tanstaafl User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows; U; Windows NT 5.1; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081209 Lightning/0.9 Thunderbird/2.0.0.19 Mnenhy/0.7.6.666 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Multiple versions of automake? References: <4B97A3A9.10401@libertytrek.org> <20100310170508.7617f250@digimed.co.uk> <4B97FE0E.2000307@libertytrek.org> <58965d8a1003101305o7d9cdb5cvae8b774047f083e1@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <58965d8a1003101305o7d9cdb5cvae8b774047f083e1@mail.gmail.com> X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 614fa7bd-c55a-4ae1-8265-d0d5540c00f1 X-Archives-Hash: 1cee419f0225746a15dbbeef1113fefb On 2010-03-10 4:05 PM, Paul Hartman wrote: > On Wed, Mar 10, 2010 at 2:16 PM, Tanstaafl wrote: >> On 2010-03-10 12:05 PM, Neil Bothwick wrote: >>> equery can be unreliable. If emerge --depclean -a wants to remove one >>> of both of them, let it, otherwise leave well alone. >> How does that differ from 'emerge -p --depclean'? > Saves you the time of running it twice if you decide to say "Yes" Well that was kind of obvious... ;) ok, thanks... -- Charles