From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NmNVT-0003Bc-PS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 02 Mar 2010 08:31:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1258E08A0; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.243.182.46.78.clients.your-server.de (static.243.182.46.78.clients.your-server.de [78.46.182.243]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BB7B7E08A0 for ; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 08:30:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: by static.243.182.46.78.clients.your-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1001) id 7C0CB5DA94; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:30:14 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on mail.local X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-101.4 required=4.3 tests=ALL_TRUSTED, USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 Received: from [10.11.12.18] (unknown [10.11.12.18]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-CAMELLIA256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by static.243.182.46.78.clients.your-server.de (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id ADDE55DA86; Tue, 2 Mar 2010 09:30:13 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B8CCC9A.6040502@j-schmitz.net> Date: Tue, 02 Mar 2010 09:30:18 +0100 From: Justin User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.9.1.7) Gecko/20100224 Lightning/1.0b2pre Thunderbird/3.0.1 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Official document for stabilization policy/guideline References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0.1 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig3CACF0B6850D49606E336C17" X-Archives-Salt: 88734bf3-624b-454a-86d4-9205de87df77 X-Archives-Hash: 6447f2127eb179798bc219d3b1ebf95e This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig3CACF0B6850D49606E336C17 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable On 01/03/10 16:39, Lie Ryan wrote: > I've found a few people referencing to a "30-day stabilization policy" > which basically says a package must be at least 30-days-old to be > considered for stabilization, but is there any document that serves as > an official guideline/checklist on how to consider to stabilize a > package? Is the 30-day policy the only policy? >=20 > I've been running several ~arch-ed packages that appears to be compile > and runs fine on my machine and would like to vote them for > stabilization. Is it enough to just open a bug issue and pray that the > arch manager would notice? >=20 >=20 You might be interested in those two things too http://phajdan-jr.blogspot.com/2010/03/stabilizing-package-is-serious-thi= ng.html http://www.mail-archive.com/gentoo-dev@lists.gentoo.org/msg36433.html --------------enig3CACF0B6850D49606E336C17 Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (GNU/Linux) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org/ iEYEARECAAYFAkuMzJsACgkQgAnW8HDreRa0HwCgxR7AH+Mbh6g5w3LC/usSxWu1 TOcAoM8W37OAn3BLInTghAJkyCKUsCO+ =29GI -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig3CACF0B6850D49606E336C17--