From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Removing KDE 3.5? Or reason to keep it around?
Date: Fri, 26 Feb 2010 23:15:33 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B88AA75.2020906@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <178414.37889.qm@web65407.mail.ac4.yahoo.com>
chrome://messenger/locale/messengercompose/composeMsgs.properties:
> ----- Original Message ----
>
>
>> From: Dale<rdalek1967@gmail.com>
>>
>>> ----- Original Message ----
>>>
>>>> From: Neil Bothwick
>>>> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
>>>> On Fri, 26 Feb 2010 06:34:18 -0800 (PST), BRM wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Aside from that, I'm not sure I have ever really run "emerge
>>>>> --depclean", but I also rarely uninstall anything, but don't install
>>>>> things left or right to try out either, so typically upgrades are all I
>>>>> need to do.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> You should still run --depclean as dependencies change and you could still
>>>> have plenty of no longer needed ones installed.
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Okay - so I ran "emerge --depclean -a" and got the below.
>>> I tried running "emerge world -vuDNa" as specified, but that didn't resolve it
>>>
>> either.
>>
>>> I tried looking in the world file (/var/lib/portage/world) but didn't find any
>>>
>> entries that felt safe to remove.
>>
>>> So, how do I resolve?
>>>
>>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>>> * Dependencies could not be completely resolved due to
>>> * the following required packages not being installed:
>>> *
>>> * ~x11-libs/qt-test-4.4.2 pulled in by:
>>> * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
>>> *
>>> * ~x11-libs/qt-sql-4.4.2 pulled in by:
>>> * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
>>> *
>>> * ~x11-libs/qt-webkit-4.4.2 pulled in by:
>>> * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
>>> *
>>> * ~x11-libs/qt-assistant-4.4.2 pulled in by:
>>> * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
>>> *
>>> * ~x11-libs/qt-gui-4.4.2 pulled in by:
>>> * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
>>> *
>>> * ~x11-libs/qt-xmlpatterns-4.4.2 pulled in by:
>>> * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
>>> *
>>> * ~dev-libs/poppler-0.10.7 pulled in by:
>>> * virtual/poppler-0.10.7
>>> *
>>> * ~x11-libs/qt-opengl-4.4.2 pulled in by:
>>> * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
>>> *
>>> * ~x11-libs/qt-qt3support-4.4.2 pulled in by:
>>> * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
>>> *
>>> * ~x11-libs/qt-dbus-4.4.2 pulled in by:
>>> * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
>>> *
>>> * ~x11-libs/qt-svg-4.4.2 pulled in by:
>>> * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
>>> *
>>> * ~x11-libs/qt-script-4.4.2 pulled in by:
>>> * x11-libs/qt-4.4.2
>>> *
>>> * Have you forgotten to run `emerge --update --newuse --deep world` prior
>>> * to depclean? It may be necessary to manually uninstall packages that no
>>>
>> longer
>>
>>> * exist in the portage tree since it may not be possible to satisfy their
>>> * dependencies. Also, be aware of the --with-bdeps option that is
>>>
>> documented
>>
>>> * in `man emerge`.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>> I ran into this a long time ago and I added this to my make.conf so that
>> I don't forget. Try running this:
>>
>> emerge -uvDNa --with-bdeps y world
>>
>> Then see what that does. That added bit makes it look deeper into
>> dependencies.
>>
> Okay, tried that. I did install 7 more packages (1 new, 6 rebuilds/updates).
> But it didn't resolve the problem. I'm trying to determine if qt-4.4.2 is even installed.
> Looking at /usr/lib there doesn't appear to be any qt-4.4.2 libs, only qt-4.5.3.
>
> "qlist -Ia | grep x11-libs | grep qt" only returns the following:
> /usr/qt/3/etc/settings/.keep_x11-libs_qt-3
> /etc/qt4/.keep_x11-libs_qt-core-4
>
> Also, "find | grep libQt | grep 4\.4" didn't return anything, while "find | grep libQt | grep 4\.5 returned what I saw in /usr/lib/qt4.
>
> So, then is x11-libs/qt-4.4.2 even installed? If not, how do I get rid of this?
>
> TIA,
>
> Ben
>
>
I don't know about the command you use but you may want to try this:
equery list x11-libs/qt
See if that lists the package you are looking for.
Dale
:-) :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2010-02-27 5:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 28+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2010-02-26 4:06 [gentoo-user] Removing KDE 3.5? Or reason to keep it around? BRM
2010-02-26 4:17 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-26 5:39 ` Dale
2010-02-26 14:34 ` BRM
2010-02-26 15:10 ` Alex Schuster
2010-02-26 16:10 ` BRM
2010-02-26 18:30 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-26 18:01 ` Dale
2010-02-26 23:20 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27 0:24 ` Dale
2010-02-27 2:15 ` BRM
2010-02-27 3:11 ` Dale
2010-02-27 4:34 ` BRM
2010-02-27 5:15 ` Dale [this message]
2010-02-27 11:38 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27 3:19 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-27 3:45 ` Dale
2010-02-27 5:21 ` BRM
2010-02-27 6:53 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2010-02-27 7:21 ` Mick
2010-02-27 11:39 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27 11:41 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27 17:12 ` Dale
2010-02-27 18:26 ` Neil Bothwick
2010-02-27 19:16 ` Dale
2010-02-27 19:42 ` BRM
2010-02-27 20:16 ` Dale
2010-02-27 11:42 ` Neil Bothwick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B88AA75.2020906@gmail.com \
--to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox