From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NRcGT-0008Of-4b for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:01:50 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 340E0E0974 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 02:01:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from poseidon.vergina.dyndns.org (62.1.125.199.dsl.dyn.forthnet.gr [62.1.125.199]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 69CE0E0630 for ; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 00:39:11 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.13] (dwarfy.vergina.dyndns.org [192.168.0.13]) by poseidon.vergina.dyndns.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1E4B8FCAA; Mon, 4 Jan 2010 02:39:08 +0200 (EET) Message-ID: <4B4138AB.3060602@asyr.hopto.org> Date: Mon, 04 Jan 2010 02:39:07 +0200 From: Thanasis User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091229 Thunderbird/3.0 ThunderBrowse/3.2.6.8 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: Krzysztof Halasa CC: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org, Dirk Heinrichs , LKML Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] RAM installed vs reported References: <4B3B3043.20400@asyr.hopto.org> <200912301208.54359.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> <4B3B38F2.6090006@asyr.hopto.org> <4B3CF04E.8070603@asyr.hopto.org> <4B406CDF.7010301@asyr.hopto.org> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-7 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5015f737-b14b-477f-bf18-830adf6666e3 X-Archives-Hash: 1a963284dcec2d7feb00cb21b76c9d06 on 01/04/2010 01:10 AM Krzysztof Halasa wrote the following: > Thanasis writes: > > >> Hmm..., but are EMBEDDED options suitable for a netbook like the A110L ? >> > This "EMBEDDED" just means "don't touch these unless you really know > what you're doing". > > BTW I remember using VMSPLIT 2 GB : 2 GB on server-class machines, > before they were upgraded to x86-64. > Do you mean that I should try it? Is there any gain over using CONFIG_HIGHMEM4G ?