From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-105700-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1NPvUR-0004Gm-Vr
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:09:16 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 905C3E09D1
	for <garchives@archives.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:09:15 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from zion.lichtfels.com (zion.lichtfels.com [88.198.33.170])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EDBDCE062D
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 09:20:32 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by zion.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB2336F6C4
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:20:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from zion.lichtfels.com ([127.0.0.1])
 by localhost (zion [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP
 id 31402-10 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>;
 Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:20:21 +0100 (CET)
Received: from [172.32.99.12] (mail.oops.co.at [213.129.238.225])
	by zion.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 17D606DA09
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:20:20 +0100 (CET)
Message-ID: <4B3B1B5E.4070800@xunil.at>
Date: Wed, 30 Dec 2009 10:20:30 +0100
From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" <lists@xunil.at>
Organization: oops!
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux x86_64; en-US; rv:1.9.1.5) Gecko/20091229 Thunderbird/3.0 ThunderBrowse/3.2.6.8
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Compressed Filesystem
References: <tkrat.bab46d8e191b58f4@igpm.rwth-aachen.de> <200912291404.15508.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <4B3A8A4A.6010606@xunil.at> <200912300009.00280.volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
In-Reply-To: <200912300009.00280.volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
X-Enigmail-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-maia at lichtfels.com
X-Archives-Salt: 502096d0-161d-4a33-be90-9fddb787ea34
X-Archives-Hash: 11247ec9e8651e6dbd3bac36713a2d21

Am 30.12.2009 00:08, schrieb Volker Armin Hemmann:

>> would you recommend it over ext4 for a productive root-fs, considering
>> speed and safety .... ?
> 
> just think a moment of the tons of bug fixes constantly going into ext4. That 
> crap is not stable. Pre-alpha maybe.

hmm, thanks for that thought ...