* [gentoo-user] [lame logrotate Q]
@ 2009-12-21 0:06 Harry Putnam
2009-12-21 3:52 ` Dale
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Harry Putnam @ 2009-12-21 0:06 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Can anyone show me how to write a logrotate rule that will rotate on
either size or age?
I use some very simple scripting for yrs but don't really see how to
rotate on more than one condition.
I'd like to rotate a certain log weekly or over 7000k and keep no more
than 12 rotations for whatever reason.
/var/log/debug.log {
create 0600 reader wheel
weekly || size=7000k
rotate 12
postrotate
/etc/init.d/rsyslog reload > /dev/null 2>&1 || true
endscript
}
Is clearly NOT the right way to go.
Any know how to do it?
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [lame logrotate Q]
2009-12-21 0:06 [gentoo-user] [lame logrotate Q] Harry Putnam
@ 2009-12-21 3:52 ` Dale
2009-12-21 6:42 ` Alan McKinnon
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dale @ 2009-12-21 3:52 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Harry Putnam wrote:
> Can anyone show me how to write a logrotate rule that will rotate on
> either size or age?
>
> I use some very simple scripting for yrs but don't really see how to
> rotate on more than one condition.
>
> I'd like to rotate a certain log weekly or over 7000k and keep no more
> than 12 rotations for whatever reason.
>
> /var/log/debug.log {
> create 0600 reader wheel
> weekly || size=7000k
> rotate 12
> postrotate
> /etc/init.d/rsyslog reload > /dev/null 2>&1 || true
> endscript
> }
>
> Is clearly NOT the right way to go.
>
> Any know how to do it?
>
man logrotate has a few examples that may help. Here is one.
"/var/log/httpd/access.log" /var/log/httpd/error.log {
rotate 5
mail www@my.org
size 100k
sharedscripts
postrotate
/usr/bin/killall -HUP httpd
endscript
}
I notice that the size part is on its own line which may be the issue.
Dale
:-) :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [lame logrotate Q]
2009-12-21 3:52 ` Dale
@ 2009-12-21 6:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-21 16:14 ` [gentoo-user] " reader
` (2 more replies)
0 siblings, 3 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2009-12-21 6:42 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On Monday 21 December 2009 05:52:55 Dale wrote:
> Harry Putnam wrote:
> > Can anyone show me how to write a logrotate rule that will rotate on
> > either size or age?
> >
> > I use some very simple scripting for yrs but don't really see how to
> > rotate on more than one condition.
> >
> > I'd like to rotate a certain log weekly or over 7000k and keep no more
> > than 12 rotations for whatever reason.
> >
> > /var/log/debug.log {
> > create 0600 reader wheel
> > weekly || size=7000k
> > rotate 12
> > postrotate
> > /etc/init.d/rsyslog reload > /dev/null 2>&1 || true
> > endscript
> > }
> >
> > Is clearly NOT the right way to go.
> >
> > Any know how to do it?
>
> man logrotate has a few examples that may help. Here is one.
>
> "/var/log/httpd/access.log" /var/log/httpd/error.log {
> rotate 5
> mail www@my.org
> size 100k
> sharedscripts
> postrotate
> /usr/bin/killall -HUP httpd
> endscript
> }
>
>
> I notice that the size part is on its own line which may be the issue.
That will rotate his log when it gets to 100k, and only when it gets to 100k.
The OP wants to rotate when either the log file is a certain size, or every
week, whichever comes first.
Logrotate does not support that feature.
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: [lame logrotate Q]
2009-12-21 6:42 ` Alan McKinnon
@ 2009-12-21 16:14 ` reader
2009-12-26 19:21 ` Mick
2009-12-21 16:48 ` [gentoo-user] Problem with old nvidia-drivers-71.86.11 (depending x11-base/xorg-server vanished form portage-tree) Christian Könitzer
2009-12-21 22:14 ` [gentoo-user] [lame logrotate Q] Neil Bothwick
2 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: reader @ 2009-12-21 16:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> writes:
>> I notice that the size part is on its own line which may be the issue.
>
> That will rotate his log when it gets to 100k, and only when it gets to 100k.
> The OP wants to rotate when either the log file is a certain size, or every
> week, whichever comes first.
>
> Logrotate does not support that feature.
Thanks Alan... saved me dicking around with it endlessly.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Problem with old nvidia-drivers-71.86.11 (depending x11-base/xorg-server vanished form portage-tree)
2009-12-21 6:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-21 16:14 ` [gentoo-user] " reader
@ 2009-12-21 16:48 ` Christian Könitzer
2009-12-21 21:38 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2009-12-21 21:40 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2009-12-21 22:14 ` [gentoo-user] [lame logrotate Q] Neil Bothwick
2 siblings, 2 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christian Könitzer @ 2009-12-21 16:48 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Hi list,
I'm using a quite old NVIDIA card aqnd it worked well but since a few
days it seams to be deprecated. After a eix --sync I got this:
emerge -DuN world
Calculating dependencies... done!
emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "<x11-base/xorg-server-1.4.99".
(dependency required by "x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-71.86.11" [installed])
(dependency required by "world" [argument])
And eix tells me:
eix x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
[D] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
Available versions: [M]71.86.09!s [M]71.86.11!s [m]96.43.13!s
[m](~)96.43.14!s [m]173.14.20!s [m](~)173.14.20-r1!s [m](~)173.14.22!s
[m]180.60!s [m]185.18.36!s [m](~)185.18.36-r1!s [m](~)190.29!s
[m](~)190.42-r2!s [m](~)190.42-r3!s {acpi custom-cflags gtk
kernel_FreeBSD kernel_linux multilib userland_BSD}
Installed versions: 71.86.11!s(10:52:39 23.10.2009)(acpi gtk
kernel_linux -custom-cflags -kernel_FreeBSD -multilib -userland_BSD)
Homepage: http://www.nvidia.com/
Description: NVIDIA X11 driver and GLX libraries
and:
eix x11-base/xorg-server
[I] x11-base/xorg-server
Available versions: 1.5.3-r6 1.6.3.901-r2 1.6.5-r1 ~1.7.3
~1.7.3.901 ~1.7.3.901-r1 {3dfx debug dmx hal input_devices_acecad
input_devices_aiptek input_devices_citron input_devices_elographics
input_devices_evdev input_devices_fpit input_devices_hyperpen
input_devices_joystick input_devices_keyboard input_devices_mouse
input_devices_mutouch input_devices_penmount input_devices_synaptics
input_devices_tslib input_devices_virtualbox input_devices_vmmouse
input_devices_void input_devices_wacom ipv6 kdrive minimal nptl sdl
tslib video_cards_apm video_cards_ark video_cards_ast video_cards_chips
video_cards_cirrus video_cards_dummy video_cards_epson video_cards_fbdev
video_cards_geode video_cards_glint video_cards_i128 video_cards_i740
video_cards_impact video_cards_intel video_cards_mach64 video_cards_mga
video_cards_neomagic video_cards_newport video_cards_nv
video_cards_nvidia video_cards_r128 video_cards_radeon
video_cards_radeonhd video_cards_rendition video_cards_s3
video_cards_s3virge video_cards_savage video_cards_siliconmotion
video_cards_sis video_cards_sisusb video_cards_sunbw2
video_cards_suncg14 video_cards_suncg3 video_cards_suncg6
video_cards_sunffb video_cards_sunleo video_cards_suntcx
video_cards_tdfx video_cards_tga video_cards_trident video_cards_tseng
video_cards_v4l video_cards_vesa video_cards_via video_cards_virtualbox
video_cards_vmware video_cards_voodoo video_cards_xgi xorg}
Installed versions: 1.6.5-r1(09:35:40 12.12.2009)(hal nptl sdl
xorg -debug -dmx -ipv6 -kdrive -minimal -tslib)
Homepage: http://xorg.freedesktop.org/
Description: X.Org X servers
As descriped by the user guid I'm not doing wrong:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/nvidia-guide.xml
In /etc/portage/package.mask i added:
...
>=sys-kernel/gentoo-sources-2.6.28
>=sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.13
>=x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-87.00
...
In /etc/portage/package.keywords I added:
...
x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers ~x86
...
So for me it looks like the xorg server which is required by my
nvidia-card (x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-71.86.11) isn't longer in the
portage-tree...
Don't know what to do now - do I need to buy a newer graphiccard? :O ;)
Hopefully not...
cheers Chris
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* [gentoo-user] Re: Problem with old nvidia-drivers-71.86.11 (depending x11-base/xorg-server vanished form portage-tree)
2009-12-21 16:48 ` [gentoo-user] Problem with old nvidia-drivers-71.86.11 (depending x11-base/xorg-server vanished form portage-tree) Christian Könitzer
@ 2009-12-21 21:38 ` walt
2009-12-22 9:56 ` Christian Könitzer
2009-12-21 21:40 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: walt @ 2009-12-21 21:38 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
On 12/21/2009 08:48 AM, Christian Könitzer wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm using a quite old NVIDIA card aqnd it worked well but since a few days it seams to be deprecated. After a eix --sync I got this:
> emerge -DuN world
> Calculating dependencies... done!
>
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "<x11-base/xorg-server-1.4.99".
> (dependency required by "x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-71.86.11" [installed])
Hm. I used that driver until very recently, when my brother-in-law
upgraded his video card and gave the old one for free. His timing
is not usually that good. :o)
You can still use the nv driver, if that's adequate for your needs.
If the nv driver isn't good enough, then I'd say it's time upgrade your
video card after all these years. I never really noticed any difference
between the nvidia and nv drivers when I still used the old TNT card.
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with old nvidia-drivers-71.86.11 (depending x11-base/xorg-server vanished form portage-tree)
2009-12-21 16:48 ` [gentoo-user] Problem with old nvidia-drivers-71.86.11 (depending x11-base/xorg-server vanished form portage-tree) Christian Könitzer
2009-12-21 21:38 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
@ 2009-12-21 21:40 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-21 22:24 ` Dale
1 sibling, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Alan McKinnon @ 2009-12-21 21:40 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user; +Cc: Christian Könitzer
On Monday 21 December 2009 18:48:25 Christian Könitzer wrote:
> Hi list,
>
> I'm using a quite old NVIDIA card aqnd it worked well but since a few
> days it seams to be deprecated. After a eix --sync I got this:
> emerge -DuN world
> Calculating dependencies... done!
>
> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "<x11-base/xorg-server-1.4.99".
> (dependency required by "x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-71.86.11" [installed])
> (dependency required by "world" [argument])
>
>
> And eix tells me:
> eix x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
> [D] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
> Available versions: [M]71.86.09!s [M]71.86.11!s [m]96.43.13!s
> [m](~)96.43.14!s [m]173.14.20!s [m](~)173.14.20-r1!s [m](~)173.14.22!s
> [m]180.60!s [m]185.18.36!s [m](~)185.18.36-r1!s [m](~)190.29!s
> [m](~)190.42-r2!s [m](~)190.42-r3!s {acpi custom-cflags gtk
> kernel_FreeBSD kernel_linux multilib userland_BSD}
> Installed versions: 71.86.11!s(10:52:39 23.10.2009)(acpi gtk
> kernel_linux -custom-cflags -kernel_FreeBSD -multilib -userland_BSD)
> Homepage: http://www.nvidia.com/
> Description: NVIDIA X11 driver and GLX libraries
Your version of nvidia-drivers is listed as hardmasked in
profiles/package.mask:
# Mask nvidia-drivers-71.x.y since it will not work
# with xorg-server-1.5 and later which are the only
# available versions in the tree
<x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-72.0.0
You will need to find an ebuild for the version of xorg you need in an overlay
somewhere, or search the gentoo attic
You'll have to google for the URL for the attic, it's one of those things I
can never remember...
--
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] [lame logrotate Q]
2009-12-21 6:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-21 16:14 ` [gentoo-user] " reader
2009-12-21 16:48 ` [gentoo-user] Problem with old nvidia-drivers-71.86.11 (depending x11-base/xorg-server vanished form portage-tree) Christian Könitzer
@ 2009-12-21 22:14 ` Neil Bothwick
2 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Neil Bothwick @ 2009-12-21 22:14 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 457 bytes --]
On Mon, 21 Dec 2009 08:42:43 +0200, Alan McKinnon wrote:
> That will rotate his log when it gets to 100k, and only when it gets to
> 100k. The OP wants to rotate when either the log file is a certain
> size, or every week, whichever comes first.
>
> Logrotate does not support that feature.
What happens if you set up two separate rules, one to rotate at 100K and
one at 7 days?
--
Neil Bothwick
Gravity isn't easy, but it's the law.
[-- Attachment #2: signature.asc --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with old nvidia-drivers-71.86.11 (depending x11-base/xorg-server vanished form portage-tree)
2009-12-21 21:40 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
@ 2009-12-21 22:24 ` Dale
2009-12-22 9:55 ` Christian Könitzer
0 siblings, 1 reply; 12+ messages in thread
From: Dale @ 2009-12-21 22:24 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Monday 21 December 2009 18:48:25 Christian Könitzer wrote:
>
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I'm using a quite old NVIDIA card aqnd it worked well but since a few
>> days it seams to be deprecated. After a eix --sync I got this:
>> emerge -DuN world
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>>
>> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "<x11-base/xorg-server-1.4.99".
>> (dependency required by "x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-71.86.11" [installed])
>> (dependency required by "world" [argument])
>>
>>
>> And eix tells me:
>> eix x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
>> [D] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
>> Available versions: [M]71.86.09!s [M]71.86.11!s [m]96.43.13!s
>> [m](~)96.43.14!s [m]173.14.20!s [m](~)173.14.20-r1!s [m](~)173.14.22!s
>> [m]180.60!s [m]185.18.36!s [m](~)185.18.36-r1!s [m](~)190.29!s
>> [m](~)190.42-r2!s [m](~)190.42-r3!s {acpi custom-cflags gtk
>> kernel_FreeBSD kernel_linux multilib userland_BSD}
>> Installed versions: 71.86.11!s(10:52:39 23.10.2009)(acpi gtk
>> kernel_linux -custom-cflags -kernel_FreeBSD -multilib -userland_BSD)
>> Homepage: http://www.nvidia.com/
>> Description: NVIDIA X11 driver and GLX libraries
>>
>
> Your version of nvidia-drivers is listed as hardmasked in
> profiles/package.mask:
>
> # Mask nvidia-drivers-71.x.y since it will not work
> # with xorg-server-1.5 and later which are the only
> # available versions in the tree
> <x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-72.0.0
>
> You will need to find an ebuild for the version of xorg you need in an overlay
> somewhere, or search the gentoo attic
>
> You'll have to google for the URL for the attic, it's one of those things I
> can never remember...
>
>
Is this it?
http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/
Dale
:-) :-)
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Problem with old nvidia-drivers-71.86.11 (depending x11-base/xorg-server vanished form portage-tree)
2009-12-21 22:24 ` Dale
@ 2009-12-22 9:55 ` Christian Könitzer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christian Könitzer @ 2009-12-22 9:55 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
I don't think this is it...
Am 21.12.2009 23:24, schrieb Dale:
> Alan McKinnon wrote:
>> On Monday 21 December 2009 18:48:25 Christian Könitzer wrote:
>>> Hi list,
>>>
>>> I'm using a quite old NVIDIA card aqnd it worked well but since a few
>>> days it seams to be deprecated. After a eix --sync I got this:
>>> emerge -DuN world
>>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>>>
>>> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "<x11-base/xorg-server-1.4.99".
>>> (dependency required by "x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-71.86.11"
>>> [installed])
>>> (dependency required by "world" [argument])
>>>
>>>
>>> And eix tells me:
>>> eix x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
>>> [D] x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers
>>> Available versions: [M]71.86.09!s [M]71.86.11!s [m]96.43.13!s
>>> [m](~)96.43.14!s [m]173.14.20!s [m](~)173.14.20-r1!s [m](~)173.14.22!s
>>> [m]180.60!s [m]185.18.36!s [m](~)185.18.36-r1!s [m](~)190.29!s
>>> [m](~)190.42-r2!s [m](~)190.42-r3!s {acpi custom-cflags gtk
>>> kernel_FreeBSD kernel_linux multilib userland_BSD}
>>> Installed versions: 71.86.11!s(10:52:39 23.10.2009)(acpi gtk
>>> kernel_linux -custom-cflags -kernel_FreeBSD -multilib -userland_BSD)
>>> Homepage: http://www.nvidia.com/
>>> Description: NVIDIA X11 driver and GLX libraries
>>
>> Your version of nvidia-drivers is listed as hardmasked in
>> profiles/package.mask:
>>
>> # Mask nvidia-drivers-71.x.y since it will not work
>> # with xorg-server-1.5 and later which are the only
>> # available versions in the tree
>> <x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-72.0.0
>>
>> You will need to find an ebuild for the version of xorg you need in
>> an overlay somewhere, or search the gentoo attic
>>
>> You'll have to google for the URL for the attic, it's one of those
>> things I can never remember...
>>
>
> Is this it?
>
> http://sources.gentoo.org/viewcvs.py/
>
> Dale
>
> :-) :-)
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Problem with old nvidia-drivers-71.86.11 (depending x11-base/xorg-server vanished form portage-tree)
2009-12-21 21:38 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
@ 2009-12-22 9:56 ` Christian Könitzer
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Christian Könitzer @ 2009-12-22 9:56 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
After reading what overlays are I decided to unmerge my nvidia drivers
and use the nv driver instead.
Thanks for all your answers! :-)
Am 21.12.2009 22:38, schrieb walt:
> On 12/21/2009 08:48 AM, Christian Könitzer wrote:
>> Hi list,
>>
>> I'm using a quite old NVIDIA card aqnd it worked well but since a few
>> days it seams to be deprecated. After a eix --sync I got this:
>> emerge -DuN world
>> Calculating dependencies... done!
>>
>> emerge: there are no ebuilds to satisfy "<x11-base/xorg-server-1.4.99".
>> (dependency required by "x11-drivers/nvidia-drivers-71.86.11"
>> [installed])
>
> Hm. I used that driver until very recently, when my brother-in-law
> upgraded his video card and gave the old one for free. His timing
> is not usually that good. :o)
>
> You can still use the nv driver, if that's adequate for your needs.
>
> If the nv driver isn't good enough, then I'd say it's time upgrade your
> video card after all these years. I never really noticed any difference
> between the nvidia and nv drivers when I still used the old TNT card.
>
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
* Re: [gentoo-user] Re: [lame logrotate Q]
2009-12-21 16:14 ` [gentoo-user] " reader
@ 2009-12-26 19:21 ` Mick
0 siblings, 0 replies; 12+ messages in thread
From: Mick @ 2009-12-26 19:21 UTC (permalink / raw
To: gentoo-user
[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1689 bytes --]
On Monday 21 December 2009 16:14:50 reader@newsguy.com wrote:
> Alan McKinnon <alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> writes:
> >> I notice that the size part is on its own line which may be the issue.
> >
> > That will rotate his log when it gets to 100k, and only when it gets to
> > 100k. The OP wants to rotate when either the log file is a certain size,
> > or every week, whichever comes first.
> >
> > Logrotate does not support that feature.
>
> Thanks Alan... saved me dicking around with it endlessly.
There is a default setting that determines how often files will be rotated if
you set this up the top of /etc/logrotate.conf:
# rotate log files weekly
weekly
This can be overwritten on a file by file basis; e.g.:
===========================================================
# no packages own lastlog or wtmp -- we'll rotate them here
/var/log/wtmp {
monthly
create 0664 root utmp
rotate 1
}
===========================================================
If you intend to use a different rotating frequency for your file in question
then you may want to try this:
===========================================================
/var/log/debug.log
{
create 0600 reader wheel
rotate 12
weekly
size=7000k
postrotate
/etc/init.d/rsyslog reload > /dev/null 2>&1 || true
endscript
}
===========================================================
As far as I know when either the period of one week, or a file size of 7000k
is reached the file will be rotated (by whichever condition is met first).
Keep an eye on it and play with the file size to confirm that it works for
you.
HTH.
--
Regards,
Mick
[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 12+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2009-12-26 20:01 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-21 0:06 [gentoo-user] [lame logrotate Q] Harry Putnam
2009-12-21 3:52 ` Dale
2009-12-21 6:42 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-21 16:14 ` [gentoo-user] " reader
2009-12-26 19:21 ` Mick
2009-12-21 16:48 ` [gentoo-user] Problem with old nvidia-drivers-71.86.11 (depending x11-base/xorg-server vanished form portage-tree) Christian Könitzer
2009-12-21 21:38 ` [gentoo-user] " walt
2009-12-22 9:56 ` Christian Könitzer
2009-12-21 21:40 ` [gentoo-user] " Alan McKinnon
2009-12-21 22:24 ` Dale
2009-12-22 9:55 ` Christian Könitzer
2009-12-21 22:14 ` [gentoo-user] [lame logrotate Q] Neil Bothwick
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox