From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NI6om-0000OW-0W for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 08 Dec 2009 20:37:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id F1738E0776; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zion.lichtfels.com (zion.lichtfels.com [88.198.33.170]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C2F70E0776 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 20:37:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zion.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2D8D118400B for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:36:57 +0100 (CET) Received: from zion.lichtfels.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zion [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP id 17575-01 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:36:55 +0100 (CET) Received: from [172.32.99.12] (mail.oops.co.at [213.129.238.225]) by zion.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id B4C4F184003 for ; Tue, 8 Dec 2009 21:36:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <4B1EB8EF.8060808@xunil.at> Date: Tue, 08 Dec 2009 21:37:03 +0100 From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" Organization: oops! User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091207) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] went from x86 to ~x86: no more X11 References: <4B1EA880.3000800@xunil.at> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.96.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-maia at lichtfels.com X-Archives-Salt: 74ceb29f-6f2b-4b61-9abb-0568b5e24ad2 X-Archives-Hash: 65b1d780014bc0af937e312d26fa07f9 Joshua Murphy schrieb: > Looking at that log, my first question is... does your thinkpad run > 1680x1050? Yes. ThinkPad R61 ... > The RECORD disable shouldn't make a difference on X > actually loading, based on the message it gives, and the (EE) lines > about dri/dri2 shouldn't be an issue with nvidia drivers if I recall > (my box with an nvidia card's down at the moment, and it's on a > slightly older version of X and nvidia drivers, old hardware as it > is). dri/dri2-warnings were there before as well, yes ... And the RECORD-message is in the log of my (working) ~amd64-box as well. > Also, is this with or without hal & dbus? newest few versions of > X were finicky with me about running -hal, but work fine with +hal (as > long as hal is running as well). hald and dbus running, xorg-server with +hal. thank you, Stefan