From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: Your system might be broken and/or insecure due to serious patch-2.6 bug
Date: Mon, 07 Dec 2009 18:17:51 -0600 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4B1D9B2F.7050602@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200912080104.32371.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>
Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 08 December 2009 00:46:18 Philip Webb wrote:
>
>> 091207 Neil Bothwick wrote:
>>
>>> On Sun, 6 Dec 2009 14:49:44 -0500, Philip Webb wrote:
>>>
>>>> I know that from my home-made list of pkgs which I have installed,
>>>> where they are marked with 'W' & system pkgs with 'S'.
>>>> Yes, I do have to keep it upto-date as I do emerges.
>>>> One of the major deficiencies of Gentoo is
>>>> that it doesn't provide such a file automatically.
>>>>
>>> emerge -p @system
>>> emerge -p @world
>>>
>> root:501 ~> emerge -p @system
>> !!! '@system' is not a valid package atom.
>> !!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details.
>> root:502 ~> emerge -p @world
>> !!! '@world' is not a valid package atom.
>> !!! Please check ebuild(5) for full details.
>>
>> 'man 5 ebuild' has nothing relevant to '@' 'system' 'world' '-p'.
>> I'm using the latest stable Portage-2.1.6.3 .
>>
>
> Your version of portage does not support sets.
>
>
>> Any further advice ?
>>
>> Let me emphasise yet again: the way I do things has been successful
>> on 2 machines for more than 6 years; it's others who have problems
>> doing it their way & regularly seek advice on this list as a result.
>>
>
> Let me correct you there:
>
> The experienced old hands here almost uniformly do not have such problems.
> It's the n00bs who don't grok portage just yet, or don't know to look inside
> ebuilds when the ebuild goes wonky, who have such problems. The classic cause
> of problems is mixing stable and testing
>
>
OP,
And I would like to mention that portage has changed a LOT in the last
six years. The way you do things apparently has not. That alone could
lead to problems. As software changes, we have to change the way we do
things in order to react to those changes. If we don't, then we could
run into problems. I first installed Gentoo from a 1.4 CD so I been
around about the same amount of time you have. Portage has changed a
whole lot since then. The way I do things has changed as well. I don't
think revdep-rebuild even existed back then. I use it regularly now.
Portage has a lot of options now that it didn't have back then. They
are there because they are needed and useful in certain situations.
Using Gentoo basically requires you to stay up to date. Getting behind
can come back to bite you. That can be said about a lot of situations
with Gentoo, both in updating the OS and updating ourselves as well.
Dale
:-) :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-12-08 0:18 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 45+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-12-01 16:02 [gentoo-user] Heads up: Your system might be broken and/or insecure due to serious patch-2.6 bug Nikos Chantziaras
2009-12-02 10:51 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-02 13:45 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
2009-12-02 14:18 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-02 16:11 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-12-02 14:33 ` Kevin O'Gorman
2009-12-02 14:48 ` Philip Webb
2009-12-02 15:30 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-02 15:49 ` Jesús Guerrero
2009-12-02 17:59 ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2009-12-02 20:04 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-02 20:54 ` Stefan G. Weichinger
2009-12-02 16:12 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-12-02 16:21 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-02 16:46 ` felix
2009-12-04 23:02 ` daid kahl
2009-12-05 5:14 ` Philip Webb
2009-12-05 6:47 ` Dale
2009-12-05 13:31 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-12-05 14:10 ` Dale
2009-12-05 17:24 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-06 1:15 ` Dale
2009-12-06 2:21 ` Philip Webb
2009-12-06 2:53 ` daid kahl
2009-12-06 9:06 ` Dale
2009-12-07 10:46 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-07 10:48 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-07 11:18 ` Dale
2009-12-05 15:08 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-05 16:10 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-12-05 19:09 ` Philip Webb
2009-12-05 20:14 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-12-06 6:20 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-06 6:19 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-06 19:49 ` Philip Webb
2009-12-07 11:01 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-07 22:46 ` Philip Webb
2009-12-07 23:04 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-12-08 0:17 ` Dale [this message]
2009-12-08 11:19 ` Arttu V.
2009-12-08 1:04 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-12-05 16:05 ` daid kahl
2009-12-05 16:26 ` [gentoo-user] Re: Heads up: Your system might be broken and/or insecure due to serious patch-2.6 bug, " Peter Humphrey
2009-12-06 10:59 ` Peter Humphrey
2009-12-06 14:11 ` Volker Armin Hemmann
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4B1D9B2F.7050602@gmail.com \
--to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox