From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7qf6-0000L1-OJ for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:21:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CF1C5E099E; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from ey-out-1920.google.com (ey-out-1920.google.com [74.125.78.146]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 95A62E099E for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 13:21:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ey-out-1920.google.com with SMTP id 3so7820eyh.16 for ; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:21:30 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=0EJpw+MUM5lxpZfhdanGElj5CRIEPlYLGDgukCe7LQs=; b=bP3rZxkm5nvKgjYdgRev2zvv94oiC6Pee47jroUmZZvs8esiIrVQb2I9A5kZQtUncW wCcD4YLGkdpT0INvM1DuuZqzHL69BuhIzlxdZJOgWQL0SND+aWAeg+EusBgTGvwVTtHm XhqQiHzyDSOjQ9t7apWfnIE3mDbeIMJYdTBOY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=t35eBPso0xrRKEwJDiPDl0t47ZAk6QLh3pR/NoEx53u/uoHCHkjyHOR3tg9OSWRrLZ U8elvnhxxTtzYpM/qrNYve9YSCqSkK+oXUiUtRyJgMoy3fzMjeILtSVkZaGpJEL2+IP+ F5Gktm+FkXcfGJzEQLz0Dx0VwRtIj5Jqsf9fg= Received: by 10.213.1.5 with SMTP id 5mr95300ebd.9.1257859289580; Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:21:29 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.0.46? (92.44.227.87.static.f.siw.siwnet.net [87.227.44.92]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 10sm9234777eyd.0.2009.11.10.05.21.23 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 10 Nov 2009 05:21:26 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4AF969BC.1080003@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 10 Nov 2009 14:25:16 +0100 From: Erik User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091031) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Has mysql become compulsory - Part 2 References: <200911100737.12213.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <200911101234.08891.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <200911101414.13672.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com> <200911101345.20087.nagatoro@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200911101345.20087.nagatoro@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-15 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5b918a21-d2e5-44f8-ac50-029648e75401 X-Archives-Hash: 4d338712c42d03dd6cb1ab0a512e3a14 Nagatoro skrev: > On Tuesday 10 November 2009 13.14.13 Alan McKinnon wrote: > [...] > >> *** glibc detected *** amarok: free(): invalid pointer: 0x0000000003295080 >> *** >> > > This is a highly debated issue, glibc has new checks for various things and it > seems like some think the checks are to strict or even wrong while others > think that the checks are ok and the applications are wrong. > Really? A pointer is valid for free() if it has been returned by malloc, calloc, realloc or strdup, and has not yet been passed to free(). What could there possibly be to debate?