From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N7F3E-0006Xa-P6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 21:11:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A51BEE09C9; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f228.google.com (mail-gx0-f228.google.com [209.85.217.228]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 82E12E09C9 for ; Sun, 8 Nov 2009 21:11:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk28 with SMTP id 28so2444132gxk.9 for ; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:11:55 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=GyNaUa3HyLGTw5aedvUJfh3JXpKobsjI0+bMH7tqSpk=; b=dQWYWKRslEejFWT3ygGWkuj0nQmgxKTF1x3GPKT7H2g+f1qdR/gDz1+irTG+RwgCNZ N5UTWcIwZ2BvpJpI477pNxvb9s2qWuObjVan7i+ygd/BUcMhyKqnw+cEEuyDIAV7q7wb CKhGT7muBrg7d5RNsueRMpPFss8yOpuPc3NuI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=eyTFcNpFkLvgnfZjSkx5xu83IHaZMMFa9ELF3mykd0al5khMs6ttUEBCJrnMM5ktrj F9wvkaayL4LpN3p/Z91B6ijbD3a7+gjTfBvxDgH7t/b76W1w9HQ8dWh8hWLVOKReEojL LmoZq37PsTbXaFSjQ/TUB/HcfYSYj4LCLHZ68= Received: by 10.150.166.7 with SMTP id o7mr11862973ybe.224.1257714715221; Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:11:55 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.1? (adsl-0-92-136.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.92.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 23sm798695ywh.18.2009.11.08.13.11.53 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:11:54 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4AF73418.5000406@gmail.com> Date: Sun, 08 Nov 2009 15:11:52 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20091007 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anybody using Seamonkey 2 ? References: <4AF6978A.6020904@gmail.com> <5d7c4e4d36314a44e33b39c71ce463d0@localhost> <4AF72AC9.6080500@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: 360fbbf7-a4af-4cc2-afc1-869af41324b0 X-Archives-Hash: a2318b6eb27ad80421c668573caa0aca Jes=C3=BAs Guerrero wrote: > On Sun, 08 Nov 2009 14:32:09 -0600, Dale wrote: > =20 >> Call me chicken, I'll wait a little bit to let them fix the bugs. I u= se >> almost the whole thing so I want to be sure it is safe.=20 >> =20 > > If I were using the mail stuff I'd certainly do that. I would wait unti= l I > am relatively sure that everything is going to work. For web usage it > really doesn't matter to have an occasional problem, and anyway in that > regard seamonkey 2 is going pretty well. But mail is another story. :) > > In any case, if you are going to test it be sure to make backups, just = in > case. > =20 Oh I will be making backups for sure. Seamonkey is sort of like KDE4, I'm hoping to be able to use the new ones real soon. KDE4 still has a few things missing that makes it unusable for me. It is getting a LOT closer tho.=20 Glad to hear the web browsing part is good tho.=20 Thanks. Dale :-) :-)=20