From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N61OT-0007hb-LH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 12:24:49 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 532B5E0A86; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com (mail-yx0-f174.google.com [209.85.210.174]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 36612E0A86 for ; Thu, 5 Nov 2009 12:24:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe4 with SMTP id 4so593110yxe.32 for ; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:24:48 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=plexQfwVfM8DCVdy5kmQwiKPUrFQ6bRS7+Nxb7z+vvU=; b=PzLBax0nuAdJ4bK8CgW0O+uoAyeRTz+gpmBTS+xSVR8/GT/MIrYX1ZjwUSBaUDkJlW UdbRSLPPsvUxglROF+QzNHYjFEP2c3/BBHeRsnStZcwsSED3B7V1ig8YTe82mFFmqbeV +DLbRFSLhammlmtDM2BMHqqNENAOA6b+kH5BA= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=RIV84Sn4kig8a/9VjoHIUoNEYUv3+LR+WXubxJkHkNw1NrCcxWIqPKoVnthYgMfe7T mjMPeerq8RlwHaoVSM2bXIvBwtCiO2+ea5s1vJSzGb+wlyQxMai2MT+4oNzaPkzsfGxn J3dAXtHteZDsZSBTR9TLyDBAGFOHKaPM0KOP8= Received: by 10.100.235.4 with SMTP id i4mr2095702anh.101.1257423887644; Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:24:47 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?192.168.1.1? (adsl-0-115-242.jan.bellsouth.net [65.0.115.242]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 6sm934816yxg.48.2009.11.05.04.24.45 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 05 Nov 2009 04:24:46 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4AF2C40C.5050701@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 05 Nov 2009 06:24:44 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.23) Gecko/20091007 SeaMonkey/1.1.18 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Another angle on hal/xorg thread References: <87ws26s2z2.fsf@newsguy.com> <200911041724.04669.wonko@wonkology.org> <87ocnirx2t.fsf@newsguy.com> <4AF200D5.3090608@gmail.com> <4AF282A3.9090703@xunil.at> In-Reply-To: <4AF282A3.9090703@xunil.at> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 8c995dca-93af-4577-b27c-3fb5b5f776e4 X-Archives-Hash: 16bb278cdab384ffdbdc103c50fbc3d8 Stefan G. Weichinger wrote: > Dale schrieb: > > >> Me, if everything is working fine, I would leave hal out. I have >> seriously considered adding -hal to make.conf and seeing what happens. >> It just sort of tastes bad after all the hal problems I have had. >> >> Dale >> > > Why do I think of HAL in "2001" ... ? > > Think twice, you don't want a "I'm sorry, Dale (!), I'm afraid I can't > do that..." > > ;-) > > Stefan > > Didn't they kill hal 2001 before that movie was over? It's been a while since I saw it. If mine said that to me, I'd put a bullet through it. Most likely because it would scare the stuffins out of me and I would think it was possessed or something. Dale :-) :-)