From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N5W3X-0002nx-H7 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 04 Nov 2009 02:57:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E2114E0897; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 02:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtp.gentoo.org (smtp.gentoo.org [140.211.166.183]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9AEC8E0897 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 02:57:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3521166C1F for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 02:57:05 +0000 (UTC) X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-new at gentoo.org X-Spam-Score: -4.313 X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-4.313 required=5.5 tests=[AWL=-1.714, BAYES_00=-2.599] Received: from smtp.gentoo.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (smtp.gentoo.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with ESMTP id 0EMcIidyX0cR for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 02:56:58 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f221.google.com (mail-bw0-f221.google.com [209.85.218.221]) by smtp.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0C86065F76 for ; Wed, 4 Nov 2009 02:56:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz21 with SMTP id 21so8321687bwz.24 for ; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:56:56 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:references:in-reply-to; bh=c2M7mXjeofYePFHI9rej0jX6ZY8re5Ucy04Ag1EmNUo=; b=Z7RlyQH/gsRLFW5e4tXgfrC85Q+WAHBrNwVCF/Uad7gQiyi1kc3SCqENTxpvrq18mD QBjSLHwerNbYY0SHKQ1ipIi6XpTwOcnMmiKPZXiaOKRvXgCk4ZmEF8loI4mHRT9To3Lq 8fKFq7PGF+hZZHdNM/+ajTRMP8nS8adv5K/2M= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:references:in-reply-to; b=UlUWj/7dxEx9oDuhOYmBXPiDJdZIGdBrLY2/rwzqI9S9iKamq0Aq8LUhI6K9QkcF/v o684+hWvkyleZAPoAhNlISe6HZRCrFxhIDJz+yF6ZHiKu5Grc2gojj8rYhIoOAQNbFcK pDZqpgKUdPLuw35SF5reBn4BmXzpldhgtIG7o= Received: by 10.103.86.22 with SMTP id o22mr319591mul.102.1257303416548; Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:56:56 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?127.0.0.1? (gpftor4.privacyfoundation.de [87.118.104.203]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id n7sm2615168mue.27.2009.11.03.18.56.48 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Tue, 03 Nov 2009 18:56:55 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <4AF0ED3B.6050102@gmail.com> Date: Tue, 03 Nov 2009 21:55:55 -0500 From: 7v5w7go9ub0o <7v5w7go9ub0o@gmail.com> To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: [gentoo-user] Re: Gtk+ update results in slow Firefox References: <200910302023.18827.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> <200910302039.23738.volkerarmin@googlemail.com> In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Archives-Salt: 303bbe12-f91b-4adb-8277-6cf624cb4921 X-Archives-Hash: aaf89a4c42f282bee2a2b11007cd0299 Nikos Chantziaras wrote: > On 10/30/2009 10:06 PM, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> On 10/30/2009 09:39 PM, Volker Armin Hemmann wrote: >>> On Freitag 30 Oktober 2009, Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >>> >>>>> >>>>> do you have a bigger page with more scrolling showing the >>>>> problem? because it seems to be fine here. >>>> >>>> http://www.kamenos.gr >>>> >>> >>> scrolls without any lag. Instant response. No lag at all. Even >>> with effects turned on there is no lag. >> >> Then I wonder what's wrong here. It's so slow, that if I scroll the >> mouse wheel up/down quickly a few times, Firefox is still >> scrolling for several seconds after I stopped using the wheel, >> trying to catch up. Starting with a clean profile didn't help >> either. >> >> I've updated to Firefox 3.6 Beta (mozilla overlay) and this version >> restores the speed again. I guess I'll stay with this beta since >> (fortunately) the add-ons I use work with it. >> >> So I guess problem "solved." :P > > Gah, the Flash plugin is very buggy with 3.6 (rendering corruption). > I reverted to 3.5.4 and downgraded to Gtk+ 2.16.6 and gtkmm 2.16.0 > instead. > > Any pointers at to what might be wrong are still welcome. > Shot in the dark here. NVidia updated their drivers at about the time you started having problems. Their latest driver update changed the permissions on /dev/nvidia0 nvidiactl ; resulting in VERY slow scrolling response on my box (amd64) using googleearth. Changing the permissions to crwxrw-rw- resulted in instant speed up; you may get by with r--r-- (?). HTH