From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N4GCM-00032W-9J for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:49:02 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 1DEE6E0A96; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:49:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yx0-f174.google.com (mail-yx0-f174.google.com [209.85.210.174]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F12DAE0A9E for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 15:49:00 +0000 (UTC) Received: by yxe4 with SMTP id 4so3456634yxe.32 for ; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:49:00 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=km0BAKmGcO9wLp/aDaXSL5q6UHivxIm2XdzM6oqi2oU=; b=Ul064qgp1Kn4/Bu3MlhuG8hWm1o+6a3+EMzcTpZFgTjp4HGgEluhCJDgtWd9D2tXfx hltoaiDFaDMeJEQhK7SkjUCXgyY5OehHYZyq8Y6yHLx5hUC+8hvou2+hF2hVBsdWoj3s QYwvYV9JDXCBK2hK0SjNU367DukK2NT1GE/fw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=AjnHYm1aRzPuKct7nti9hRL3eQUGrAmQTyP/nORm/DhR94LwhukcjFjdKsbbB0ImPw 57bfH/9E+rFcjLHXdyc4sD+fcQFg/HQCXlMjRwQ9l5Z92qP0m14SBJVJtLkh+uO2o/k3 ZJTyHDNQv8GALkQy8pwn7C3it4MOA8/V/Wer0= Received: by 10.150.30.6 with SMTP id d6mr5142469ybd.140.1257004140649; Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:49:00 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.10.7? (c-68-47-168-136.hsd1.tn.comcast.net [68.47.168.136]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 22sm1466754ywh.30.2009.10.31.08.48.59 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Sat, 31 Oct 2009 08:48:59 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AEC5C3A.9030307@gmail.com> Date: Sat, 31 Oct 2009 11:48:10 -0400 From: Valmor de Almeida User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091019) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glxgears with no ... gears?! References: <200910062105.14151.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <200910100011.07063.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200910100011.07063.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 674a29e9-dd21-4bdf-914d-4922ecc64473 X-Archives-Hash: e56bacc1ae90d54f9d0d7415b4d83cb2 Mick wrote: > Am I the only one with dodgy glxgears? Any ideas at all? > > On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Mick wrote: >> I've updated xorg following all relevant instructions by gentoo devs on an >> old laptop and when I run glxgears I get no graphic and pedestrian speeds: >> >> $ glxgears >> 629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.622 FPS >> 629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.718 FPS >> 627 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.377 FPS >> >> If I maximise the window, still no gears just a black terminal window and I >> get: >> >> 93 frames in 5.0 seconds = 18.474 FPS >> >> It's never been that bad before. I've noticed that emerge -uDv world >> pulled in xorg-drivers and it also emerged xf86-video-ati. I attach the >> list of the packages that were emerged today and my Xorg.0.log, just in >> case you see something amiss in there. >> >> Please ask if you need more info. >> >> PS. I have no xorg.conf, but can post the *.fdi files if needed. > > > No. See recent post: [gentoo-user] Xorg slow after upgrade -- Valmor