[gentoo-user] glxgears with no ... gears?!

[gentoo-user] glxgears with no ... gears?!

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1.1: Type: text/plain, Size: 807 bytes --]

I've updated xorg following all relevant instructions by gentoo devs on an old 
laptop and when I run glxgears I get no graphic and pedestrian speeds:

$ glxgears
629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.622 FPS
629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.718 FPS
627 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.377 FPS

If I maximise the window, still no gears just a black terminal window and I 
get:

93 frames in 5.0 seconds = 18.474 FPS

It's never been that bad before.  I've noticed that emerge -uDv world pulled 
in xorg-drivers and it also emerged xf86-video-ati.  I attach the list of the 
packages that were emerged today and my Xorg.0.log, just in case you see 
something amiss in there.

Please ask if you need more info.

PS.  I have no xorg.conf, but can post the *.fdi files if needed.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #1.2: history.txt.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/x-bzip2, Size: 1151 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #1.3: Xorg.0.log.bz2 --]
[-- Type: application/x-bzip2, Size: 8432 bytes --]

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

[gentoo-user] Re: glxgears with no ... gears?!

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 946 bytes --]

Am I the only one with dodgy glxgears?  Any ideas at all?

On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Mick wrote:
> I've updated xorg following all relevant instructions by gentoo devs on an
> old laptop and when I run glxgears I get no graphic and pedestrian speeds:
>
> $ glxgears
> 629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.622 FPS
> 629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.718 FPS
> 627 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.377 FPS
>
> If I maximise the window, still no gears just a black terminal window and I
> get:
>
> 93 frames in 5.0 seconds = 18.474 FPS
>
> It's never been that bad before.  I've noticed that emerge -uDv world
> pulled in xorg-drivers and it also emerged xf86-video-ati.  I attach the
> list of the packages that were emerged today and my Xorg.0.log, just in
> case you see something amiss in there.
>
> Please ask if you need more info.
>
> PS.  I have no xorg.conf, but can post the *.fdi files if needed.



-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glxgears with no ... gears?!

[Valmor de Almeida]

Mick wrote:
> Am I the only one with dodgy glxgears?  Any ideas at all?
> 
> On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Mick wrote:
>> I've updated xorg following all relevant instructions by gentoo devs on an
>> old laptop and when I run glxgears I get no graphic and pedestrian speeds:
>>
>> $ glxgears
>> 629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.622 FPS
>> 629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.718 FPS
>> 627 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.377 FPS
>>
>> If I maximise the window, still no gears just a black terminal window and I
>> get:
>>
>> 93 frames in 5.0 seconds = 18.474 FPS
>>
>> It's never been that bad before.  I've noticed that emerge -uDv world
>> pulled in xorg-drivers and it also emerged xf86-video-ati.  I attach the
>> list of the packages that were emerged today and my Xorg.0.log, just in
>> case you see something amiss in there.
>>
>> Please ask if you need more info.
>>
>> PS.  I have no xorg.conf, but can post the *.fdi files if needed.
> 
> 
> 
No. See recent post: [gentoo-user] Xorg slow after upgrade

--
Valmor

Re: [gentoo-user] Re: glxgears with no ... gears?!

[Mick]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: Text/Plain, Size: 1636 bytes --]

On Saturday 31 October 2009 15:48:10 Valmor de Almeida wrote:
> Mick wrote:
> > Am I the only one with dodgy glxgears?  Any ideas at all?
> >
> > On Tuesday 06 October 2009, Mick wrote:
> >> I've updated xorg following all relevant instructions by gentoo devs on
> >> an old laptop and when I run glxgears I get no graphic and pedestrian
> >> speeds:
> >>
> >> $ glxgears
> >> 629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.622 FPS
> >> 629 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.718 FPS
> >> 627 frames in 5.0 seconds = 125.377 FPS
> >>
> >> If I maximise the window, still no gears just a black terminal window
> >> and I get:
> >>
> >> 93 frames in 5.0 seconds = 18.474 FPS
> >>
> >> It's never been that bad before.  I've noticed that emerge -uDv world
> >> pulled in xorg-drivers and it also emerged xf86-video-ati.  I attach the
> >> list of the packages that were emerged today and my Xorg.0.log, just in
> >> case you see something amiss in there.
> >>
> >> Please ask if you need more info.
> >>
> >> PS.  I have no xorg.conf, but can post the *.fdi files if needed.
> 
> No. See recent post: [gentoo-user] Xorg slow after upgrade
> 
> --
> Valmor

Thanks Valmor, I saw the thread.  I don't run KDE4 only xdm/fluxbox (although 
I run KDE4 applications individually).  In the past the odd xorg upgrade might 
have made things worse, until a new version came out and restored performance 
to a good/acceptable level.  This current deterioration in performance has 
been gradual since I think xorg 1.5.  All I can assume is that my hardware is 
so getting so old that it is becoming unsupported.
-- 
Regards,
Mick

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 198 bytes --]