public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]  emerge advises upgrade profile
Date: Mon, 26 Oct 2009 19:23:54 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4AE63D9A.5030108@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200910270148.06419.alan.mckinnon@gmail.com>

Alan McKinnon wrote:
> On Tuesday 27 October 2009 01:31:27 Harry Putnam wrote:
>   
>> My profile has been
>>     ../usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/2008.0
>>
>> starting an update system today I'm told my profile is depricated and
>> to update to default/linux/x86/10.0
>>
>> I've forgotten about how this is done.  Is it just a matter of
>>
>>   ln -sf
>>  /usr/portage/profiles/default/linux/x86/10.0 /etc/make.profile ?
>>     
>
> yes
>
>  
>   
>> Or does it involve something like a major regrind of every package?
>>     
>
> no
>
>
>   
>> A quick google with site:gentoo.org "change profile" shows dozens of
>> hits in forum messages, but I didn't notice a HOWTO or concise
>> walk-thru.
>>     
>
> It's in the gentoo docs - remember that long thing you read when you installed 
> gentoo the first time, and probably haven't read again? yes, that one :-)
>
> All a profile does is specify some default standard packages for system, 
> default USE flags and some other various bits and pieces. Once you have set 
> your make.conf up the way you want, very little in the way of profile changes 
> affect you.
>
> If you find forum posts that go on about large re-emerges of world and other 
> nonsense, well you should understand that such comments represent the average 
> level of cluelessness of your average forum user and you should treat it as 
> such
>
>
>
>   

Yep, I synced the tree, did the profile change and I think I had like
two upgrades.  I'm pretty sure I would have had those even if I hadn't
changed the profile.

It is possible to have a lot of packages with changes but not to
likely.  I subscribe to -dev so I can see most of the screw-ups that are
headed my way.  Let's not get started on that hal and xorg-server thing
again tho.  That one surprised me for sure.

Dale

:-)  :-) 



  reply	other threads:[~2009-10-27  0:24 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 18+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-10-26 23:31 [gentoo-user] emerge advises upgrade profile Harry Putnam
2009-10-26 23:36 ` Crístian Viana
2009-10-26 23:40 ` Sebastian Beßler
2009-10-26 23:48 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-10-27  0:23   ` Dale [this message]
2009-10-26 23:48 ` William Kenworthy
2009-10-26 23:52   ` Alan McKinnon
2009-10-27  1:52     ` W.Kenworthy
2009-10-27  4:52       ` Dale
2009-10-27  3:23     ` [gentoo-user] " Harry Putnam
2009-10-27  5:33       ` Jonathan Callen
2009-10-28 16:43         ` Harry Putnam
2009-10-27  8:41       ` Alan McKinnon
2009-10-27  8:46         ` Justin
2009-10-28 16:52         ` Harry Putnam
2009-10-28 16:59           ` Alan McKinnon
2009-10-28 22:03             ` Dale
2009-10-28 23:43               ` Alan McKinnon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4AE63D9A.5030108@gmail.com \
    --to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox