From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1N23wx-0002JA-CS for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:20:03 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AAE6CE0992; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.oversi.com (oversrv1.oversi.com [209.88.189.2]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 70882E0992 for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:20:01 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [10.2.2.28] (unknown [10.2.2.28]) by mail.oversi.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id A723F588FDA for ; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:15:54 +0200 (IST) Message-ID: <4AE45E90.1030509@oversi.com> Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 16:20:00 +0200 From: Amit Dor-Shifer User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090605) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Uncle: qt-*:4 dependencies/blocks preventing world update References: <7bef1f890910221419o76c9ffc1j58aca7f79cdd6410@mail.gmail.com> <200910251208.38676.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> <4AE44A4D.1040700@oversi.com> <200910251313.36237.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <200910251313.36237.michaelkintzios@gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 2ec8e25f-b8aa-454e-9f61-4c8114ef0719 X-Archives-Hash: 2f0d68ce410412df843038d133cb3039 I think that if default/linux/amd64/10.0 is a valid profile, it's reasonable to expect that the relevant news item be listed on eselect. Amit Mick wrote: > On Sunday 25 October 2009 12:53:33 Amit Dor-Shifer wrote: > >> amit0 ~ # eselect profile show >> Current make.profile symlink: >> default/linux/amd64/10.0 >> > > You may want to change this to .../amd64/10.0/desktop or server depending on > what your machine is. Then I would think that the flags for qt3support would > be enabled by default. However, I am running x86 over here so others may be > able to confirm. > >