From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Mzi8C-0001W8-9P for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:37:56 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id A74CCE0809; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Received: from vms173005pub.verizon.net (vms173005pub.verizon.net [206.46.173.5]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 920C3E0809 for ; Mon, 19 Oct 2009 02:37:54 +0000 (UTC) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: multipart/alternative; boundary="Boundary_(ID_Kh4Y+SfCCTrIoo6wiKsDTA)" Received: from [192.168.1.2] ([71.178.24.39]) by vms173005.mailsrvcs.net (Sun Java(tm) System Messaging Server 6.3-7.04 (built Sep 26 2008; 32bit)) with ESMTPA id <0KRQ00AACPYVOMEW@vms173005.mailsrvcs.net> for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Sun, 18 Oct 2009 21:37:44 -0500 (CDT) Message-id: <4ADBD17E.6090900@verizon.net> Date: Sun, 18 Oct 2009 22:39:58 -0400 From: Chris Reffett User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20091014) To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: license mask References: <92ad22480910181733k51f4cb77x5593fd12f2e7c4c7@mail.gmail.com> <4ADBC6F2.8050408@verizon.net> <4ADBCE61.1010803@gmail.com> In-reply-to: <4ADBCE61.1010803@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: c60d5011-9d49-4416-9b6a-f7d73686b813 X-Archives-Hash: 2d96f01df3e539b57e67a41aef4a0e0e This is a multi-part message in MIME format. --Boundary_(ID_Kh4Y+SfCCTrIoo6wiKsDTA) Content-type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dale wrote: > Chris Reffett wrote: > =20 >> Nikos Chantziaras wrote: >> =20 >>> On 10/19/2009 03:33 AM, Cr=C3=ADstian Viana wrote: >>> =20 >>>> hi! >>>> >>>> when I try to update virtualbox-ose-additions, portage says: >>>> >>>> !!! All ebuilds that could satisfy >>>> "~app-emulation/virtualbox-ose-additions-3.0.8" have been masked. >>>> !!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete you= r >>>> request: >>>> - app-emulation/virtualbox-ose-additions-3.0.8 (masked by: PUEL >>>> license(s)) >>>> A copy of the 'PUEL' license is located at >>>> '/usr/portage/licenses/PUEL'. >>>> >>>> it suggests me to read the Gentoo Handbook, but it isn't updated. >>>> >>>> what should I do to unmask this package? I've never seen this kind o= f >>>> masking. >>>> =20 >>> In make.conf: >>> >>> ACCEPT_LICENSE=3D"*" >>> >>> to unmask all licenses. Or else name the licenses you wish unmasked >>> one by one. >>> >>> >>> >>> =20 >> Yeah, they added this in a recent portage-2.2 rc. It masks end user >> license agreements by default (-@EULA is the syntax, if I recall >> correctly) >> >> >> =20 > > I checked make.conf.example and this is not documented yet. I'm on > portage-2.2_rc46. Is it in a later version or did I miss something?=20 > The file I checked is here: > > /usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example > > Just curious. > > Dale > > :-) =20 You've got a recent enough version, I think it came in around rc44 or=20 so. Look in 'man make.conf' for the info on it...I guess they haven't=20 changed make.conf.example yet. --Boundary_(ID_Kh4Y+SfCCTrIoo6wiKsDTA) Content-type: text/html; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Dale wrote:

Chris Reffett wrote:

Nikos Chantziaras wrote:

On 10/19/2009 03:33 AM, Cr=C3=ADstian Viana wrote:

hi!

when I try to update virtualbox-ose-additions, portage says:

!!! All ebuilds that could satisfy
"~app-emulation/virtualbox-ose-additions-3.0.8" have been masked.
!!! One of the following masked packages is required to complete your
request:
- app-emulation/virtualbox-ose-additions-3.0.8 (masked by: PUEL
license(s))
A copy of the 'PUEL' license is located at
'/usr/portage/licenses/PUEL'.

it suggests me to read the Gentoo Handbook, but it isn't updated.

what should I do to unmask this package? I've never seen this kind of
masking.

In make.conf:

  ACCEPT_LICENSE=3D"*"

to unmask all licenses.  Or else name the licenses you wish unmasked
one by one.

Yeah, they added this in a recent portage-2.2 rc. It m=
asks end user
license agreements by default (-@EULA is the syntax, if I recall
correctly)


I checked make.conf.example and this is not documented yet.  I'm on
portage-2.2_rc46.  Is it in a later version or did I miss something?=20
The file I checked is here:

/usr/share/portage/config/make.conf.example

Just curious.

Dale

:-)

You've got a recent enough version, I think it came in around rc44 or so. Look in 'man make.conf' for the info on it...I guess they haven't changed make.conf.example yet.
--Boundary_(ID_Kh4Y+SfCCTrIoo6wiKsDTA)--