From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MxSy5-0007ut-9T for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:02:13 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id BEDDAE0801; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zion.lichtfels.com (zion.lichtfels.com [88.198.33.170]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8FD14E0801 for ; Mon, 12 Oct 2009 22:01:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zion.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2A6FD18400F for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:01:30 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zion.lichtfels.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zion [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP id 26554-01 for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:01:29 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.32.99.12] (mail.oops.co.at [213.129.238.225]) by zion.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 2906D18400D for ; Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:01:29 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4AD3A741.5030109@xunil.at> Date: Tue, 13 Oct 2009 00:01:37 +0200 From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" Organization: oops! User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090929) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: how to use RAM References: <4AD3953C.5030706@xunil.at> In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-maia at lichtfels.com X-Archives-Salt: 6febd856-9d7c-433f-87c3-ec7a04c57c13 X-Archives-Hash: ae9288352aab77ef9cad69da07260ab4 Nikos Chantziaras schrieb: > One thing I did after my RAM upgrade was to put: > > vm.swappiness = 30 > > in /etc/sysctl.conf to make the kernel use less swap. (The default > swappiness is 60.) Don't use values lower than 20 though, and better > don't disable swap completely; it's marginal, but complete absence of > swap can hurt performance even with plenty of RAM. That was one of my thoughts, yes. Did that already when I got 4 gigs (and 64bit) ... ;-) Thanks anyway, Stefan