From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Msyd0-0001KG-Aj for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:49:54 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 36B0EE0957; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from zion.lichtfels.com (zion.lichtfels.com [88.198.33.170]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 025A2E0957 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 12:49:53 +0000 (UTC) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by zion.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4E3FF6F502 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:49:43 +0200 (CEST) Received: from zion.lichtfels.com ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (zion [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-maia, port 10024) with LMTP id 07930-04 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:49:42 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [172.32.99.12] (mail.oops.co.at [213.129.238.225]) by zion.lichtfels.com (Postfix) with ESMTPA id 6F5AA6F301 for ; Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:49:42 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4AC353EF.1070101@xunil.at> Date: Wed, 30 Sep 2009 14:49:51 +0200 From: "Stefan G. Weichinger" Organization: oops! User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.23 (X11/20090929) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: gnome 2.26 stable? References: <4AC283C0.5020704@xunil.at> <1254314616.2793.8.camel@maya.local> In-Reply-To: <1254314616.2793.8.camel@maya.local> X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Virus-Scanned: amavisd-maia at lichtfels.com X-Archives-Salt: dfce6032-9127-454d-9bf3-e4ab89c39a15 X-Archives-Hash: 76a9cc864c9326732c6912fbd0519075 Daniel Troeder schrieb: > I'm running testing GNOME on a "stable" system, with tesing > audio/video/gfx/xorg stuff. > Everything I consider "moving fast" is testing, the rest of the system > is stable. Works good for me. Just that I have to unmask more and more > base packages too, because they are a dependency of other unmasked > packages... Yes, that's what I fear somehow. > $ wc -l /etc/portage/package.* > 593 /etc/portage/package.keywords > 2 /etc/portage/package.mask > 32 /etc/portage/package.unmask > 23 /etc/portage/package.use > 650 total > > (cleaned number after checking for comments with > $ egrep '^#' /etc/portage/package.* > ) > > $ eix -I --only-names | wc -l > 1194 > > Well... I wouldn't call a system with 50% testing packages officially > "stable" - though it is. :D ;-) Any way to share a meaningful list of gnome-related pkgs to unmask/keyword? Just for starting off here .... Thanks, Stefan