From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MlsMb-0002QT-IM for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:43:37 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 0BB66E07D7; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:43:36 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-yw0-f204.google.com (mail-yw0-f204.google.com [209.85.211.204]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E4A35E07D7 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 22:43:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: by ywh42 with SMTP id 42so860440ywh.30 for ; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:43:35 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=sOi+FQ/NRCKIakAnBRGN5Sdd1pw6wfQGWjCOjd1Lvb8=; b=B64kFjBpsTkuZA7PkU22tPF8jpuY/Qf1TdP/a/N4598e10pwbQBYi9tpC4jvIyW7Vs 1CvJ+rgwdm7yDKFhwHMwNFzTeUEI19IGXzwGu/saP7E1hnA87orNg+nEMhbbdqi870wq vVj9iPtKMpwPRrlWjuJHUuRA3vf2E3Bw68DSY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=pEpEbgo97AeW4c2lrmRiUN2sqbfPs92xv2XIqpgLAlXzSXQNMxag7zwjAB42tGUbG8 PgJZCB7Fa4U4n4cw2VE+2EP/KYum4Kt0rj7HY/0QkacXRXEEdxJBgOzzP/nghTrawN8W lM4ZP/7iZdtBxlF8XFHprRf+XRG6sYIHv21zs= Received: by 10.90.140.1 with SMTP id n1mr1187028agd.69.1252622615457; Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:43:35 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?192.168.1.1? (adsl-222-125-64.jan.bellsouth.net [68.222.125.64]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 25sm454106aga.57.2009.09.10.15.43.33 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Thu, 10 Sep 2009 15:43:34 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4AA98113.9000504@gmail.com> Date: Thu, 10 Sep 2009 17:43:31 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090905 SeaMonkey/1.1.17 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: udev and init.d. Should it be running now? References: <4AA96A8A.6010608@gmail.com> <4AA97828.3000102@gentoo.org> In-Reply-To: <4AA97828.3000102@gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 5bf5abff-d988-4c5f-b736-95d5b5bf039e X-Archives-Hash: d4977f718141eb7ed151bbf0189a6153 Jonathan Callen (ABCD) wrote: > Dale wrote: > > Hi folks, > > > I was browsing around and noticed that I now have a udev in > > /etc/init.d/. I checked, it is not running but udevd is not running > > either. See below: > > >> root@smoker / # /etc/init.d/udev status > >> * status: stopped > >> root@smoker / # > >> root@smoker / # ps aux | grep udev > >> root 30451 0.0 0.0 1888 504 pts/0 R+ 16:04 0:00 grep > >> --colour=auto udev > >> root@smoker / # > > This is the baselayout that is installed: > > >> [I--] [ ] sys-apps/baselayout-1.12.11.1 > > I seem to recall that baselayout 2 is going to be a service thing but > > since I am on baselayout 1, should this be running? It seems to belong > > to the udev package tho according to this: > > >> root@smoker / # equery belongs /etc/init.d/udev > >> [ Searching for file(s) /etc/init.d/udev in *... ] > >> sys-fs/udev-141 (/etc/init.d/udev) > >> root@smoker / # > > You can see from that what udev version is installed too. I also > > checked the elogs and I see no mention of it being changed to a service > > or that it needs to be added to a runlevel. > > > Also, keep in mind, everything works fine. I just don't want to add it > > to boot or default runlevels and then break something. > > > Thanks for any advice. I searched the forums and udev on g.o but didn't > > see anything relevant. > > > Dale > > > :-) :-) > > > > In baselayout-1, udev is started directly by baselayout itself, outside > of any init scripts. In baselayout-2/openrc, an initscript is needed to > start udev. If you actually read the script, you may notice that the > script will immediately fail if you attempt to run it on a baselayout-1 > system, as it isn't needed. If/when you upgrade to baselayout-2/openrc, > it will automatically be added to the boot runlevel, but only if > baselayout-1 had been previously installed. > > In short, don't worry about it. :) > > (this didn't appear to send the first time, so resending...) What you say makes sense but why is udev not running on my system anymore? I noticed this mostly because I went to single user, KDE seemed to have a few processes that didn't want to die when I logged out. Anyway, I used ps and less to list those processes and noticed that udev was not running. It used to be running in the past. That got me to looking and that is when I found the init script. Even after logging back into KDE, udev was still not running. I'm sort of concerned that something is not quite right. I haven't rebooted in a week or two either. Ideas? Thoughts? Dale :-) :-)