From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: I lost the ability to boot into single user
Date: Mon, 17 Aug 2009 18:00:22 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A89E106.3080807@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1250543011.22959.41.camel@centar.nbk>
Albert Hopkins wrote:
>> Openrc no longer supports the softlevel= option on the kernel command
>> line (this hit me as well, as I use a number of different runlevels).
>> Instead, pass "S" to skip just about everything, and start a root shell
>> (via sulogin), or "1" to do the equivalent of "/sbin/rc single" (that
>> is, drop the softlevel=boot completely, and add the single character "S"
>> or "1" after a space).
>>
>> An example from my grub.conf:
>>
>> title Gentoo, current kernel (single user)
>> kernel (hd0,0)/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda5 1
>>
>> title Gentoo, current kernel (root shell)
>> kernel (hd0,0)/vmlinuz root=/dev/sda5 S
>>
>> I also have my /etc/inittab set up so that init's runlevels 2-5 go into
>> rc's various runlevels (on my machine, 2=default, 3=gui, 4=network,
>> 5=gui-network).
>>
>
> This is possibly an (unreported) bug.
>
> Just for S&G I booted with "softlevel=BOOT" on an Openrc and it reports
> that there is no runlevel BOOT and then basically puts me in single
> level mode :|, but "softlevel=boot" seems to be ignored. I think it
> "should" support it... why else would rc-update work with different
> runlevels it you are not able to use them? Also the man pages for
> rc-update and rc seem to reflect this.
>
> FWIW I usually forgo the runlevels and just use init=/bin/bash because
> it doesn't prompt for the root password and pretty much the only time i
> need to boot into single user is when I've forgotten the root
> password :P
>
> -a
>
>
>
I agree, this should be reported so it can be fixed. While
init-/bin/bash would work, it shouldn't be the only option. Who would
want to put that option in grub and make it easy for someone to hack in?
I did try softlevel=single a bit ago and it booted all the way but with
no GUI. It went waaaay past single tho. rc-status reported it was in
single user mode but it wasn't. Console #2 and up was working but X
didn't start.
Pretty darn weird. :/ Who's going to open the can of Raid?
Dale
:-) :-)
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-08-17 23:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-08-17 20:04 [gentoo-user] I lost the ability to boot into single user Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-17 20:36 ` Dale
2009-08-17 20:44 ` Paul Hartman
2009-08-17 20:47 ` [gentoo-user] " ABCD
2009-08-17 21:03 ` Albert Hopkins
2009-08-17 23:00 ` Dale [this message]
2009-08-18 1:27 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-18 23:11 ` Dan Farrell
2009-08-18 23:20 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-08-18 23:47 ` Albert Hopkins
2009-08-19 0:05 ` Shawn Haggett
2009-08-19 0:10 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-19 2:55 ` ABCD
2009-08-19 9:55 ` Renat Golubchyk
2009-08-19 21:53 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-19 22:43 ` Sebastian Beßler
2009-08-19 23:06 ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-08-20 14:23 ` [gentoo-user] " Paul Hartman
2009-08-20 16:59 ` [gentoo-user] " Nikos Chantziaras
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A89E106.3080807@gmail.com \
--to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox