From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MZVMm-0003du-AG for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 07 Aug 2009 19:44:40 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 66553E0395; Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail.allt1.se (mail.allt1.se [85.8.30.10]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 317C8E0395 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2009 19:44:39 +0000 (UTC) Received: by mail.allt1.se (Postfix, from userid 1002) id C78DD154033; Fri, 7 Aug 2009 21:41:49 +0200 (CEST) Received: from [192.168.1.100] (71.57.227.87.static.th.siw.siwnet.net [87.227.57.71]) by mail.allt1.se (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C471143543 for ; Fri, 7 Aug 2009 21:41:48 +0200 (CEST) Message-ID: <4A7C8424.2080209@coolmail.se> Date: Fri, 07 Aug 2009 21:44:36 +0200 From: pk User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090625) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Question regarding VIDEO_CARDS and unrelated question regarding USE flags References: <4A798691.7020309@coolmail.se> <200908070051.56329.wonko@wonkology.org> <4A7B8111.9080507@coolmail.se> <200908071553.40317.wonko@wonkology.org> In-Reply-To: <200908071553.40317.wonko@wonkology.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: b561f362-ed1b-48f8-8676-19de6b0741f9 X-Archives-Hash: c5d8c5e1d61b75e62d96b859ce113d2e Alex Schuster wrote: > I had tried vanilla-sources, with the same results. As expected, there > should not be much of a difference. I am not using tuxonice suspend > features, but I intend to do so in the future. Hm, ok. > I added your stuff, that did not make much of a difference. I had an empty > modules sections, but all of these modules are loaded by default. Except for > type1, which does not exist. Yea, type 1 is a left over from old days... :-) So what modules does get loaded? > I know this command from when I had a NVidia card, and I am missing the > 'YES' in my output of fglrxinfo. But I do not have a 'NO' there either. fglrxinfo is different from glxinfo. glxinfo is available in the mesa-progs package (emerging this will pull in mesa as well but there's no harm in that, unless you are tight on hard drive space - just make sure you shift back to ati opengl after emerging). > Although the symbol being missed is a different one. Sorry, I didn't read properly... > I thought I read here that they do, but may give lots of warnings in syslog. Well, I'm holding out for the open source drivers... There's nothing in newer fglrx drivers that I need currently. I wish I could be of more help though...