From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MY59x-00035O-OH for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 21:33:34 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C7035E03AF; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-pz0-f181.google.com (mail-pz0-f181.google.com [209.85.222.181]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 919D5E03AF for ; Mon, 3 Aug 2009 21:33:32 +0000 (UTC) Received: by pzk11 with SMTP id 11so2253661pzk.10 for ; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:33:32 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=2LHR50Bh/gq+0gTyIXiRUjzsOHfOBYBkc+qZ0oXSc4I=; b=hN52lvbBE5cYT6imihOBQ2CMEq32RW1KRJyJBPZ6GVZM58smVanrrd8PguqZnUqP1z gmgguAFu6shf6B10pCWBpxGJ0twxoKTehoGt64Vw0ckymaUClyJHV1NWD1SpUTE4x+lR B3xieE9jiiPA1lusstDEwjNkQnGficZY8fd5Q= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=se+VyABSFK+1kwys3OY2rDF1qNe4n1nVmPFAmsIlnTcuJr1/9JJ1cxKyL1MxxYrJ2M tHa2FkyugbiYna149xeCGugN2ZrgRoDtSh8bkJEIjG/+yeQ4VDckAGZS3S9UksUsIH3U QGbMohFauEYJNWGDxv/44pqmxyx456gwiMgro= Received: by 10.140.201.7 with SMTP id y7mr4062111rvf.204.1249335212132; Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:33:32 -0700 (PDT) Received: from ?64.89.164.16? (r164h16.dixie-net.com [64.89.164.16]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id k37sm1504006rvb.2.2009.08.03.14.33.29 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Mon, 03 Aug 2009 14:33:31 -0700 (PDT) Message-ID: <4A7757A6.2020402@gmail.com> Date: Mon, 03 Aug 2009 16:33:26 -0500 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.22) Gecko/20090628 SeaMonkey/1.1.17 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Anybody tried shake defragmenter? References: <49bf44f10908031322y2b06b5ffx76ecb27092b9edfa@mail.gmail.com> <58965d8a0908031405g1cf04cbarc77d588072fdbe89@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: <58965d8a0908031405g1cf04cbarc77d588072fdbe89@mail.gmail.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: 3251351e-385b-497b-ba5b-91596a54a5d7 X-Archives-Hash: 3dec63be3d263625cc423fbf05e720c6 Paul Hartman wrote: > On Mon, Aug 3, 2009 at 3:22 PM, Grant wrote: > >> Has anyone tried the shake defragmenter? >> > > Yes, nothing has blown up yet. :) > > > I used it a while back but couldn't really see a whole lot of difference. The numbers said it helped but not much else changed. I think logging into KDE was a little faster is about all. I'm with Alan on this one. It just doesn't get fragmented like windoze does. Dale :-) :-)