From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-98263-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1MVV0p-0007xN-Hv
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:33:27 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DF589E050F;
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:33:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from out1.smtp.messagingengine.com (out1.smtp.messagingengine.com [66.111.4.25])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C82D8E050F
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 18:33:25 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from compute1.internal (compute1.internal [10.202.2.41])
by out1.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE85C381FA4;
Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:33:25 -0400 (EDT)
Received: from heartbeat2.messagingengine.com ([10.202.2.161])
by compute1.internal (MEProxy); Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:33:25 -0400
X-Sasl-enc: 2xF57vdBvCjF6IPXHHzebMoeqXnN/2AKL70+NkXiX0y5 1248719604
Received: from [192.168.5.10] (binarywings.net [92.51.162.90])
by mail.messagingengine.com (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 77287CFF6
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 27 Jul 2009 14:33:24 -0400 (EDT)
Message-ID: <4A6DF2EC.7030408@f_philipp.fastmail.net>
Date: Mon, 27 Jul 2009 20:33:16 +0200
From: Florian Philipp <lists@f_philipp.fastmail.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.22 (X11/20090704)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} SSD instead of RAID1?
References: <49bf44f10907260346y62a6f95dyfda763fceb0bcb39@mail.gmail.com> <DC239B41-96A3-45F2-B85C-62140E346B43@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <49bf44f10907270544i5a5922ddo28d6a2c23d7ed6a8@mail.gmail.com> <4A6DE730.90103@f_philipp.fastmail.net>
In-Reply-To: <4A6DE730.90103@f_philipp.fastmail.net>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
protocol="application/pgp-signature";
boundary="------------enig3B6BA0292BFE32AEDF54C3D8"
X-Archives-Salt: 08c2ccc2-18a8-495a-8601-00439d0be01f
X-Archives-Hash: 58a6e21d30d8fbbaee8a1fd4eae96b10
This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig3B6BA0292BFE32AEDF54C3D8
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Florian Philipp schrieb:
>=20
> Where I work, we have a System-on-a-Chip (SoC) NAS. Albeit being the
> second most powerful machine we have in our server room (quad core CPU,=
> lots of RAM, three redundant power supplies and a good dozen HDDs), the=
> OSS itself resides on a removable card not bigger than my thumb.
>=20
Err, I don't know if I really have to make this clarification, but I
don't want to spread false nomenclature:
Of course, the system I describe is not really an SoC because not all
components reside on a single chip. Actually, only the basic
input/output system and persistent storage are built as an SoC or, to be
more precise, as a System-in-a-Package (SiP).
--------------enig3B6BA0292BFE32AEDF54C3D8
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.11 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkpt8vAACgkQqs4uOUlOuU8EGQCdFl74rMEhLQ8rXOlXQOpVfl5z
CN8An07QBWGPx+/F1VCOrTihNOtNxq58
=GM5X
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
--------------enig3B6BA0292BFE32AEDF54C3D8--