From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1MIVEt-0003GK-4U for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:10:15 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 04EA8E04B0; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:09:59 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smtpout.karoo.kcom.com (smtpout.karoo.kcom.com [212.50.160.34]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BBFCAE04B0 for ; Sun, 21 Jun 2009 22:09:58 +0000 (UTC) X-IronPort-AV: E=Sophos;i="4.42,263,1243810800"; d="scan'208";a="103804290" Received: from unknown (HELO [192.168.0.3]) ([91.84.15.82]) by smtpout.karoo.kcom.com with ESMTP; 21 Jun 2009 23:09:52 +0100 Message-ID: <4A3EB163.3060701@leehouse.eclipse.co.uk> Date: Sun, 21 Jun 2009 23:17:07 +0100 From: Ian Lee User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (X11/20090323) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] lvm problem -- is timing? References: <200906202248.49451.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> <200906210957.30381.dirk.heinrichs@online.de> <20090621224933.393362c3@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> In-Reply-To: <20090621224933.393362c3@zaphod.digimed.co.uk> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: f8740270-95ca-4ac9-8e2c-092302cd3cbb X-Archives-Hash: 5933e04f67ff3575c9a197d3f892e5ef Neil Bothwick wrote: > On Sun, 21 Jun 2009 15:16:49 -0600, Maxim Wexler wrote: > >> mount: /dev/vg/tmp already mounted on /tmp >> mount: tmpfs already mounted on /tmp > > It's nothing to do with your problem, but why are you mounting two > filesystems on /tmp? > >> Couldn't find device with uuid 'ldwVeS-gwl4-HE4Z-M3Gw-DILI-Dbjh-2lHroF'. > > Can you confirm this is the SD card? > > I still think there may be a delay in the kernel seeing the SD card, this > used to happen with my Eee. Have you tried adding a sleep command to the > relevant part of init.d/bootmisc? > > How large is the SSD in your Eee? Is it really necessary to have a volume > group spanning the SSD and SD card, two very different devices? > > Would I be correct in thinking the SSD is a sata device while the SD is a usb device?? How are you USB drivers compiled in the kenrnel?