public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Dale <rdalek1967@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] [ot] no more inodes
Date: Fri, 29 May 2009 14:02:50 -0500	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A20315A.5080003@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <a0811460905291032ma2cac6cw4d68d705b18a93d0@mail.gmail.com>

Maxim Wexler wrote:
> Ok, thanks everybody, getting ready to dive in and fix this thing. Two
> more questions please:
>
> I modified the bottom of /etc/fstab to look like this according to a
> post in the eee forum:
> ...
> #shm    /dev/shm    tmpfs    nodev,sosuid,noexec                 0 0
> tmpfs    /tmp            tmpfs   defaults,noatime,mode=1777     0 0
>
> Does this have anything to do with the inode issue?
>
> What's the best fs for a 4G SSD? I picked ext3 because of another eee
> forum post.
>
> Maxim
>
>   

Since I have a old install, maybe the new fstabs don't have this info. 
This is what is in mine:


# NOTE: The next line is critical for boot!
none            /proc        proc        defaults        0 0
# glibc 2.2 and above expects tmpfs to be mounted at /dev/shm for
# POSIX shared memory (shm_open, shm_unlink).
# (tmpfs is a dynamically expandable/shrinkable ramdisk, and will
#  use almost no memory if not populated with files)
# Adding the following line to /etc/fstab should take care of this:
none            /dev/shm        tmpfs        defaults        0 0


From that I gather that the system won't boot without /proc and that
glibc requires /dev/shm for some reason or other.  I'm not sure why you
want to remove something that appears to be required.  Maybe you have
something different that doesn't need this?

Hope that helps.

Dale

:-)  :-) 



  reply	other threads:[~2009-05-29 19:03 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 19+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-05-28 15:46 [gentoo-user] [ot] no more inodes Maxim Wexler
2009-05-28 16:09 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-28 16:16 ` Florian Philipp
2009-05-28 21:43   ` Maxim Wexler
2009-05-28 22:20     ` Alan McKinnon
2009-05-29  2:12   ` Volker Armin Hemmann
2009-05-29 17:32     ` Maxim Wexler
2009-05-29 19:02       ` Dale [this message]
2009-05-29 19:56       ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-30  1:39         ` Maxim Wexler
2009-05-30  4:22           ` Mike Kazantsev
2009-05-30 13:37           ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-30 10:06       ` Tweaks for SSDs [Was: [gentoo-user] [ot] no more inodes] Florian Philipp
2009-05-30 13:40         ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-30 19:25           ` Eray Aslan
2009-05-30 21:56             ` Neil Bothwick
2009-06-03 13:50               ` Wyatt Epp
2009-06-03 21:36         ` Maxim Wexler
2009-05-28 19:15 ` [gentoo-user] [ot] no more inodes Alan McKinnon

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=4A20315A.5080003@gmail.com \
    --to=rdalek1967@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox