From: Steve <gentoo_sjh@shic.co.uk>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] A networking question...
Date: Thu, 07 May 2009 19:38:56 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <4A032AC0.6000801@shic.co.uk> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <4A017DA0.7010802@anferny.me.uk>
Anthony Metcalf wrote:
> *That* depends on the exact specifics of what he is/isn't allowed to
> be showing....."They" may not even want the service to show as
> existing at that address for whatever reason.
Thanks for all your discussion... I'll try to clarify - the PPP over
SSH approach does seem to offer the best compromise.
I've a development site which hosts https and http services for existing
applications both remotely and locally. I'm developing an entirely new
https service under Apache and want to be absolutely sure that I get no
unexpected interactions between configurations for "live" services and
the experimental in-development service - and I definitely don't want a
random member of the public stumbling across the in-development site -
which might expose unacceptable vulnerabilities as rough-cuts of code
are trialled.
It is entirely acceptable for any host on my LAN to access the
in-development service. I want to allow collaborators to access the
in-development service remotely over a SSH tunnel from their LAN, too
(where I'm also not concerned about abuse...)
The snag I'm finding at the moment I'm sure I'll overcome... and relates
to access from my LAN. While I can sort-of see how to establish a new
device with a new IP address on the remote LAN (with SSH and pppd) I'm
not sure how to establish a second IP address for my single Ethernet
adaptor to make this work on my LAN (though I'm sure it is do-able...)
I'm also curious to discover if there is a neat Gentooish way to
establish my two instances of Apache. I'm broadly familiar to doing
this a hackish way - but I'd prefer it plays nicely with any emerge updates.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-05-07 18:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 14+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-05-05 20:32 [gentoo-user] A networking question Steve
2009-05-05 21:23 ` Sascha Hlusiak
2009-05-05 21:28 ` Steve
2009-05-05 21:51 ` Sascha Hlusiak
2009-05-05 22:07 ` Mick
2009-05-06 0:24 ` Mike Kazantsev
2009-05-06 7:54 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-06 10:09 ` Anthony Metcalf
2009-05-06 10:42 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-05-06 12:08 ` Anthony Metcalf
2009-05-07 18:38 ` Steve [this message]
2009-05-07 22:34 ` Mick
2009-05-08 12:38 ` Steve
2009-05-08 14:43 ` Mick
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=4A032AC0.6000801@shic.co.uk \
--to=gentoo_sjh@shic.co.uk \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox