public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
* [gentoo-user] rsync reverts to old file versions
@ 2009-12-29  1:16 Grant
  2009-12-29  2:08 ` Boy Hartsuiker
  2010-01-01 18:29 ` [gentoo-user] " Harry Putnam
  0 siblings, 2 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Grant @ 2009-12-29  1:16 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: Gentoo mailing list

I've been using a command like this to sync my music files across 2 systems:

rsync -vr --inplace --delete /path/to/music/ grant@192.168.1.2:/path/to/music

Periodically, I'll manually touch up cover art that I've scanned, and
I've noticed that it will revert to the untouched-up version after one
of these rsyncs.  Does that make sense to anyone?

- Grant



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] rsync reverts to old file versions
  2009-12-29  1:16 [gentoo-user] rsync reverts to old file versions Grant
@ 2009-12-29  2:08 ` Boy Hartsuiker
  2009-12-29 15:46   ` Grant
  2010-01-01 18:29 ` [gentoo-user] " Harry Putnam
  1 sibling, 1 reply; 4+ messages in thread
From: Boy Hartsuiker @ 2009-12-29  2:08 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

On Mon, 2009-12-28 at 17:16 -0800, Grant wrote:
> Periodically, I'll manually touch up cover art that I've scanned, and
> I've noticed that it will revert to the untouched-up version after one
> of these rsyncs.  Does that make sense to anyone?
> 
> - Grant

So it it synchronizes in the opposite direction of the one given in the
command?





^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* Re: [gentoo-user] rsync reverts to old file versions
  2009-12-29  2:08 ` Boy Hartsuiker
@ 2009-12-29 15:46   ` Grant
  0 siblings, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Grant @ 2009-12-29 15:46 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

>> Periodically, I'll manually touch up cover art that I've scanned, and
>> I've noticed that it will revert to the untouched-up version after one
>> of these rsyncs.  Does that make sense to anyone?
>>
>> - Grant
>
> So it it synchronizes in the opposite direction of the one given in the
> command?

It's weird.  It sounds like it's not ringing bells for anyone so I'll
keep testing and come back with something more concrete.

- Grant



^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

* [gentoo-user]  Re: rsync reverts to old file versions
  2009-12-29  1:16 [gentoo-user] rsync reverts to old file versions Grant
  2009-12-29  2:08 ` Boy Hartsuiker
@ 2010-01-01 18:29 ` Harry Putnam
  1 sibling, 0 replies; 4+ messages in thread
From: Harry Putnam @ 2010-01-01 18:29 UTC (permalink / raw
  To: gentoo-user

Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com> writes:

> rsync -vr --inplace --delete /path/to/music/ grant@192.168.1.2:/path/to/music

what OSs' are the hosts?

I've had that happen a time or two when the source host was a windows
machine, having something to do with the way windows handles
permissions and dates.  The windows files were seen as all new even
though they had been rsynced the previous week and only a few
additions had been made (Nothing was found to be `uptodate') 




^ permalink raw reply	[flat|nested] 4+ messages in thread

end of thread, other threads:[~2010-01-01 20:01 UTC | newest]

Thread overview: 4+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2009-12-29  1:16 [gentoo-user] rsync reverts to old file versions Grant
2009-12-29  2:08 ` Boy Hartsuiker
2009-12-29 15:46   ` Grant
2010-01-01 18:29 ` [gentoo-user] " Harry Putnam

This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox