From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-102454-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
id 1N2Asm-0005TX-LC
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:44:12 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 89ED2E08DD;
Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:44:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail-pz0-f174.google.com (mail-pz0-f174.google.com [209.85.222.174])
by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5CA25E08DD
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 21:44:11 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by pzk4 with SMTP id 4so11762141pzk.32
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:44:11 -0700 (PDT)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
:content-transfer-encoding;
bh=RyN2cWbDdsliN+4XjLekh4KEpL6rtLCIi1uQtemx2Ok=;
b=lTXRzstnKLLYYUfe8PZt8M8A/yE6nz/wY6mxJreauVCL8zy+c2eSsZn3pJXMBsPyPd
ekjX+Fw3U+nNg43BnQfZKl4cTTFjb0DwoNIppLs6SYiQqO2CgwRMSJ4vS/RylHUoibK4
WBwzD/Ba/090tGILq1i+9i0ai71S/UG4aiS24=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
b=PFDurswrhJ4YnSSdYoxKMTWbrw4xUzBYtdxNTk5D2KEJw6pZao8yzQJ+B7EKeHDTFj
TDBVENhQv2TBqSCzmHkBnYYMin/AszY2AeeoPt4ms32eMaNEzBo5zvV3U4jIwq1ybYOP
vUqrLGLKRhj0y15k4QDNQjzIf9K59HPAhMVvM=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.115.84.39 with SMTP id m39mr21081251wal.62.1256507050958; Sun,
25 Oct 2009 14:44:10 -0700 (PDT)
In-Reply-To: <200910252239.53918.volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
References: <49bf44f10910251437q530ddecdv4a669d2587e70f79@mail.gmail.com>
<200910252239.53918.volkerarmin@googlemail.com>
Date: Sun, 25 Oct 2009 14:44:10 -0700
Message-ID: <49bf44f10910251444g6bdc99e4u473dd510a1c6621a@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] lm_sensors much hotter in 2.6.31 than 2.6.28
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
X-Archives-Salt: a8a4f7c0-5ee9-41d8-8f48-9f870f5723f9
X-Archives-Hash: 47facba4e0fd411639748b27ef83f863
>> After upgrading from 2.6.28 to 2.6.31, I noticed my CPU temperatures
>> are reported a full 20C hotter. =A0If I load the old kernel, the
>> reported temperatures drops back down to normal. =A0Has anyone else seen
>> this?
>>
>> - Grant
>>
>
> no, but I suspect that lm_sensors is just reporting more correctly with t=
he
> newer kernel.
I considered that, but the reported temps don't seem to rise and fall
with CPU activity like they did before. I think there's a bug of some
sort here.
- Grant