From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-95994-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>) id 1MASVT-00037h-F5 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 30 May 2009 17:38:07 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id EDD84E0383; Sat, 30 May 2009 17:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-gx0-f176.google.com (mail-gx0-f176.google.com [209.85.217.176]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D3642E0383 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 30 May 2009 17:38:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: by gxk24 with SMTP id 24so23585073gxk.10 for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 30 May 2009 10:38:05 -0700 (PDT) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:date:message-id:subject :from:to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/FU9Cs19RYcC8wflo0QJWgtnrrtYVk57o68wT+TPRzY=; b=osPY2TIcUz5U+jaaRzOED3dAbI58py7L12wH6fW5902oERFKu+mf7BOj3qA1TyAxPJ HD9tb/rSprkL4LFdQAxnIPQO7of99hR3vhzE1Uc6zxUkxAmB6OmPejv8zANZ3Z9pqftC 2RqhiW45O3uuQiGgY2bYGj+xDHKwWRBK2qp90= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; b=nkAoZjUPcZaLrAGKnTNxp+gQhS7ED3PjOLPdZe/24JX2fSan5LxNIEnDBmYWuuusEe FskFzTQ8HWW1xBQeuMYXOKSp3Xy1Qgu4S9riZByn/vt5JbVbUv6Fs0y08+8T0c9Bfa5z BfYmeIyIIwu4Xy/S6n+F1J+LCn9Epq9s4dLHA= Precedence: bulk List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org> List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org> List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org> X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.90.49.8 with SMTP id w8mr3318910agw.48.1243705085573; Sat, 30 May 2009 10:38:05 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sat, 30 May 2009 10:38:05 -0700 Message-ID: <49bf44f10905301038v244d6209t37520ea5a956e388@mail.gmail.com> Subject: [gentoo-user] Disabling swap & mounting /tmp on tmpfs = new standard? From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com> To: Gentoo mailing list <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: ebf78a58-3310-4dba-8990-d6541c30f727 X-Archives-Hash: 8f9133cc314c3702f00b64eb15c6cb97 I recently disabled swap and mounted /tmp on tmpfs for a netbook since the SSD is so slow, and now I'm wondering if that would be a wise move for all of my Gentoo systems. In what type of situation would it be a bad idea? - Grant