[gentoo-user] More weird portage behavior

[gentoo-user] More weird portage behavior

[Grant]

I'm getting more weird portage behavior and I don't see how to solve
this.  I've tried un-emerging and re-emerging ffmpeg to no avail.
Please let me know if you have any ideas.

# emerge -avDuN world

These are the packages that would be merged, in order:

Calculating dependencies... done!
[ebuild     UD] media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20090201-r1 [20099999]
USE="3dnow%* X aac alsa%* encode%* hardcoded-tables mmx mmxext%* mp3
sdl speex%* ssse3%* theora threads vorbis x264 xvid zlib (-altivec)
-amr% -bindist -custom-cflags% -debug -dirac -doc -gsm -ieee1394 -ipv6
-network -oss -schroedinger -test -v4l -v4l2% -vhook% (-amrnb%)
(-amrwb%) (-icc%) (-imlib%*) (-truetype%*) (-vdpau%*)" 0 kB [1=>0]

Total: 1 package (1 downgrade), Size of downloads: 0 kB
Portage tree and overlays:
 [0] /usr/portage
 [1] /usr/portage/local/layman/berkano

!!! Multiple package instances within a single package slot have been pulled
!!! into the dependency graph, resulting in a slot conflict:

media-video/ffmpeg:0

  ('installed', '/', 'media-video/ffmpeg-20099999', 'nomerge') pulled in by
    >=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20070129 required by ('installed',
'/', 'media-libs/xine-lib-1.1.9999', 'nomerge')
    media-video/ffmpeg required by ('installed', '/',
'media-sound/picard-0.11', 'nomerge')
    >=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20080326 required by ('installed',
'/', 'media-libs/wxsvg-1.0', 'nomerge')
    (and 4 more)

  ('ebuild', '/', 'media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20090201-r1', 'merge') pulled in by
    >=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20090201[encode] required by
('installed', '/', 'media-video/dvdstyler-1.7.2_beta4', 'nomerge')
    (and 7 more)

  Explanation:

    New USE are correctly set, but --newuse wasn't requested, so an
    installed package with incorrect USE happened to get pulled into the
    dependency graph. In order to solve this, either specify the --newuse
    option or explicitly  reinstall 'media-video/ffmpeg:0'.

# equery depends ffmpeg
[ Searching for packages depending on ffmpeg... ]
media-libs/libquicktime-1.0.3 (ffmpeg? >=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20070616)
media-libs/wxsvg-1.0 (ffmpeg? >=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20080326)
media-libs/xine-lib-1.1.9999 (>=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20070129)
media-plugins/gst-plugins-ffmpeg-0.10.5 (>=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20081014)
media-sound/mpd-9999 (ffmpeg? media-video/ffmpeg)
media-sound/picard-0.11 (ffmpeg? media-video/ffmpeg)
media-video/dvdstyler-1.7.2_beta4 (>=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20090201[encode])
media-video/vlc-0.9.8a (ffmpeg? >=media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20070616)

- Grant

Re: [gentoo-user] More weird portage behavior

[Alan McKinnon]

On Sunday 01 March 2009 19:42:05 Grant wrote:
> I'm getting more weird portage behavior and I don't see how to solve
> this.  I've tried un-emerging and re-emerging ffmpeg to no avail.
> Please let me know if you have any ideas.
>
> # emerge -avDuN world
                ^
               This
entirely conflicts with

>     New USE are correctly set, but --newuse wasn't requested, so an
                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
this.

What version of portage are you on? Try mask it, downgrade, and try again. If 
that fixes, I strongly suspect you have uncovered a bug that needs reporting.

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com

Re: [gentoo-user] More weird portage behavior

[Grant]

>> I'm getting more weird portage behavior and I don't see how to solve
>> this.  I've tried un-emerging and re-emerging ffmpeg to no avail.
>> Please let me know if you have any ideas.
>>
>> # emerge -avDuN world
>                ^
>               This
> entirely conflicts with
>
>>     New USE are correctly set, but --newuse wasn't requested, so an
>                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> this.
>
> What version of portage are you on? Try mask it, downgrade, and try again. If
> that fixes, I strongly suspect you have uncovered a bug that needs reporting.

I've tried portage-2.1.6.7 and 2.1.6.4 with the same results.

- Grant

Re: [gentoo-user] More weird portage behavior

[Dirk Heinrichs]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 183 bytes --]

Am Sonntag, 1. März 2009 18:42:05 schrieb Grant:
>  [0] /usr/portage
>  [1] /usr/portage/local/layman/berkano

Any chance ffmpeg is provided by both overlays?

Bye...

	Dirk

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] More weird portage behavior

[Grant]

>>  [0] /usr/portage
>>  [1] /usr/portage/local/layman/berkano
>
> Any chance ffmpeg is provided by both overlays?
>
> Bye...
>
>        Dirk

Yes, media-video/ffmpeg-20099999 is provided by berkano and
media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p2009020 is provided by /usr/portage.  Is
that a problem?

- Grant

Re: [gentoo-user] More weird portage behavior

[Dirk Heinrichs]

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 574 bytes --]

Am Sonntag, 1. März 2009 19:20:25 schrieb Grant:
> >>  [0] /usr/portage
> >>  [1] /usr/portage/local/layman/berkano
> >
> > Any chance ffmpeg is provided by both overlays?
>
> Yes, media-video/ffmpeg-20099999 is provided by berkano and
> media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p2009020 is provided by /usr/portage.  Is
> that a problem?

Yes. You've got ffmpeg-20099999 installed, but media-
video/dvdstyler-1.7.2_beta4 wants to have ffmpeg with the "encode" USE flag, 
which your installed version doesn't seem to have, but ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20090201 
does.

Bye...

	Dirk

[-- Attachment #2: This is a digitally signed message part. --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 190 bytes --]

Re: [gentoo-user] More weird portage behavior

[Grant]

>> >>  [0] /usr/portage
>> >>  [1] /usr/portage/local/layman/berkano
>> >
>> > Any chance ffmpeg is provided by both overlays?
>>
>> Yes, media-video/ffmpeg-20099999 is provided by berkano and
>> media-video/ffmpeg-0.4.9_p2009020 is provided by /usr/portage.  Is
>> that a problem?
>
> Yes. You've got ffmpeg-20099999 installed, but media-
> video/dvdstyler-1.7.2_beta4 wants to have ffmpeg with the "encode" USE flag,
> which your installed version doesn't seem to have, but ffmpeg-0.4.9_p20090201
> does.
>
> Bye...
>
>        Dirk

Good eye Dirk, I think that's it.  Thank you.

- Grant

Re: [gentoo-user] More weird portage behavior

[Alan McKinnon]

On Sunday 01 March 2009 19:59:05 Grant wrote:
> >> I'm getting more weird portage behavior and I don't see how to solve
> >> this.  I've tried un-emerging and re-emerging ffmpeg to no avail.
> >> Please let me know if you have any ideas.
> >>
> >> # emerge -avDuN world
> >
> >                ^
> >               This
> > entirely conflicts with
> >
> >>     New USE are correctly set, but --newuse wasn't requested, so an
> >
> >                                     ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> > this.
> >
> > What version of portage are you on? Try mask it, downgrade, and try
> > again. If that fixes, I strongly suspect you have uncovered a bug that
> > needs reporting.
>
> I've tried portage-2.1.6.7 and 2.1.6.4 with the same results.

OK. Meawhile Dirk spotted the overlay thing, which looks a likely candidate 
for the true cause

-- 
alan dot mckinnon at gmail dot com