public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which USB device on which controller?
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 12:21:21 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49bf44f10902271221k30134a9fg907bc477dfc3683@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A82351.8090009@gmail.com>

>>> I'm looking at the box of one of the webcams and it says "USB 2.0
>>> compatible".
>>>
>>
>> A USB 1.1 device _is_ "USB 2.0 compatible" because a USB 2.0
>> will slow down and run at 1.1 speed.  Does the device say it's
>> "high speed" USB?  "USB 2.0 compatible" generally means it's a
>> USB 1.1 device.
>>
>>
>>> It's not a cable problem because the cable is built right into
>>> the webcam.  I'm not trying to get the webcam to go faster
>>> back and forth to the controller, I just need to make sure I
>>> don't have both webcams on the same OHCI (1.1) USB controller.
>>> I would think buying a USB expansion card would work, but I
>>> have an EHCI (2.0) controller on this system and a second OHCI
>>> (1.1) controller.
>>>
>>> Does anyone have any idea on this.  It really doesn't make sense.
>>>
>>
>> Sounds like it's a 1.1 device to me.
>>
>>
>
> Yep, that's what it sounds like to me too.
>
> Dale

But that's OK isn't it?  I don't need 2.0 speeds between each webcam
and the controller, I just need the increased overall bandwidth of a
2.0 controller so one of the 1.1 webcams doesn't use all of it.  I get
the feeling I have a misconception somewhere along the line here.
Could someone straighten me out?

- Grant



  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-27 20:29 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-27  3:34 [gentoo-user] Which USB device on which controller? Grant
2009-02-27  3:53 ` Dale
2009-02-27  5:42   ` Grant
2009-02-27  6:08     ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-02-27  6:43     ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
2009-02-27 15:37       ` Grant
2009-02-27 15:47         ` Alan McKinnon
2009-02-27 16:53           ` Grant
2009-02-27 15:55         ` Dale
2009-02-27 17:00           ` Grant
2009-02-27 17:26             ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-02-27 17:30               ` Dale
2009-02-27 20:21                 ` Grant [this message]
2009-02-27 21:19                   ` Joshua Murphy
2009-02-27 21:24                   ` Dale
2009-02-27 23:34                   ` Mark Knecht
2009-02-28  5:24                   ` Grant Edwards
2009-02-28 14:54                     ` Grant
2009-02-28 18:30                       ` Mark Knecht
2009-03-01 18:41                         ` Grant
2009-03-01 19:29                         ` Grant
2009-02-28 20:09                       ` Neil Bothwick
2009-02-27 12:50 ` [gentoo-user] " Mark Knecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49bf44f10902271221k30134a9fg907bc477dfc3683@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=emailgrant@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox