From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which USB device on which controller?
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:00:44 -0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49bf44f10902270900q2ec748f6p489fc1839bf32f7d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A80CEE.5000200@gmail.com>
>> You seem to be right on here Dale. usbview showed my printer
>> connected to the 2.0 controller and a webcam connected to the 1.1
>> controller, so I unplugged the printer and plugged the webcam into
>> it's slot and it still showed up under 1.1. So there doesn't appear
>> to be any slot/controller correlation.
>>
>> This is a problem for me though. My webcams can't both operate on the
>> 1.1 controller at the same time due to the bandwidth limitation of the
>> 1.1 controller. I need them both on 2.0 or one on each controller,
>> but they are always grabbed by the 1.1 controller. Even worse, I
>> disabled support for 1.1 in the kernel so only 2.0 was supported and
>> the webcams didn't show up at all. Could they be USB 1.1 only?
>> Shouldn't a 1.1 device operate on a 2.0 controller?
>>
>> - Grant
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> This is how I understand it. Any 2.0 device should work with the older
> 1.0 version, just slower. Backwards compatible. However, like with my
> camera, if the device is a version 1.0, it will only work in 1.0 mode.
> If you recently purchased this, you may want to exchange it and make
> sure you get a 2.0 version. That is if there is such a creature.
>
> The reason behind this is the chip inside the camera/webcam itself. The
> cable can cause this if it is not made for the new higher bandwidth or
> is crappy but if the chip in there is the old 1.0 version, it can't go
> any faster.
>
> Another idea, you may be able to get a card to expand your USB ports and
> see if that will help. Each card has its own chip as well. Put one
> device on the card and one on the mobo port. That way they are seen and
> controlled by separate chips. That should help with the bandwidth
> problem at least.
>
> Dale
I'm looking at the box of one of the webcams and it says "USB 2.0
compatible". It's not a cable problem because the cable is built
right into the webcam. I'm not trying to get the webcam to go faster
back and forth to the controller, I just need to make sure I don't
have both webcams on the same OHCI (1.1) USB controller. I would
think buying a USB expansion card would work, but I have an EHCI (2.0)
controller on this system and a second OHCI (1.1) controller.
Does anyone have any idea on this. It really doesn't make sense.
- Grant
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2009-02-27 17:00 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2009-02-27 3:34 [gentoo-user] Which USB device on which controller? Grant
2009-02-27 3:53 ` Dale
2009-02-27 5:42 ` Grant
2009-02-27 6:08 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-02-27 6:43 ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
2009-02-27 15:37 ` Grant
2009-02-27 15:47 ` Alan McKinnon
2009-02-27 16:53 ` Grant
2009-02-27 15:55 ` Dale
2009-02-27 17:00 ` Grant [this message]
2009-02-27 17:26 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-02-27 17:30 ` Dale
2009-02-27 20:21 ` Grant
2009-02-27 21:19 ` Joshua Murphy
2009-02-27 21:24 ` Dale
2009-02-27 23:34 ` Mark Knecht
2009-02-28 5:24 ` Grant Edwards
2009-02-28 14:54 ` Grant
2009-02-28 18:30 ` Mark Knecht
2009-03-01 18:41 ` Grant
2009-03-01 19:29 ` Grant
2009-02-28 20:09 ` Neil Bothwick
2009-02-27 12:50 ` [gentoo-user] " Mark Knecht
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49bf44f10902270900q2ec748f6p489fc1839bf32f7d@mail.gmail.com \
--to=emailgrant@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox