public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Which USB device on which controller?
Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:00:44 -0800	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49bf44f10902270900q2ec748f6p489fc1839bf32f7d@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <49A80CEE.5000200@gmail.com>

>> You seem to be right on here Dale.  usbview showed my printer
>> connected to the 2.0 controller and a webcam connected to the 1.1
>> controller, so I unplugged the printer and plugged the webcam into
>> it's slot and it still showed up under 1.1.  So there doesn't appear
>> to be any slot/controller correlation.
>>
>> This is a problem for me though.  My webcams can't both operate on the
>> 1.1 controller at the same time due to the bandwidth limitation of the
>> 1.1 controller.  I need them both on 2.0 or one on each controller,
>> but they are always grabbed by the 1.1 controller.  Even worse, I
>> disabled support for 1.1 in the kernel so only 2.0 was supported and
>> the webcams didn't show up at all.  Could they be USB 1.1 only?
>> Shouldn't a 1.1 device operate on a 2.0 controller?
>>
>> - Grant
>>
>>
>>
>
>
> This is how I understand it.  Any 2.0 device should work with the older
> 1.0 version, just slower.  Backwards compatible.  However, like with my
> camera, if the device is a version 1.0, it will only work in 1.0 mode.
> If you recently purchased this, you may want to exchange it and make
> sure you get a 2.0 version.  That is if there is such a creature.
>
> The reason behind this is the chip inside the camera/webcam itself.  The
> cable can cause this if it is not made for the new higher bandwidth or
> is crappy but if the chip in there is the old 1.0 version, it can't go
> any faster.
>
> Another idea, you may be able to get a card to expand your USB ports and
> see if that will help.  Each card has its own chip as well.  Put one
> device on the card and one on the mobo port.  That way they are seen and
> controlled by separate chips.  That should help with the bandwidth
> problem at least.
>
> Dale

I'm looking at the box of one of the webcams and it says "USB 2.0
compatible".  It's not a cable problem because the cable is built
right into the webcam.  I'm not trying to get the webcam to go faster
back and forth to the controller, I just need to make sure I don't
have both webcams on the same OHCI (1.1) USB controller.  I would
think buying a USB expansion card would work, but I have an EHCI (2.0)
controller on this system and a second OHCI (1.1) controller.

Does anyone have any idea on this.  It really doesn't make sense.

- Grant



  reply	other threads:[~2009-02-27 17:00 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-02-27  3:34 [gentoo-user] Which USB device on which controller? Grant
2009-02-27  3:53 ` Dale
2009-02-27  5:42   ` Grant
2009-02-27  6:08     ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-02-27  6:43     ` [gentoo-user] " Dale
2009-02-27 15:37       ` Grant
2009-02-27 15:47         ` Alan McKinnon
2009-02-27 16:53           ` Grant
2009-02-27 15:55         ` Dale
2009-02-27 17:00           ` Grant [this message]
2009-02-27 17:26             ` [gentoo-user] " Grant Edwards
2009-02-27 17:30               ` Dale
2009-02-27 20:21                 ` Grant
2009-02-27 21:19                   ` Joshua Murphy
2009-02-27 21:24                   ` Dale
2009-02-27 23:34                   ` Mark Knecht
2009-02-28  5:24                   ` Grant Edwards
2009-02-28 14:54                     ` Grant
2009-02-28 18:30                       ` Mark Knecht
2009-03-01 18:41                         ` Grant
2009-03-01 19:29                         ` Grant
2009-02-28 20:09                       ` Neil Bothwick
2009-02-27 12:50 ` [gentoo-user] " Mark Knecht

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49bf44f10902270900q2ec748f6p489fc1839bf32f7d@mail.gmail.com \
    --to=emailgrant@gmail.com \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox