From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LUUiq-0004To-05 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 23:30:28 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id C453BE051C; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-fx0-f20.google.com (mail-fx0-f20.google.com [209.85.220.20]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 58F2DE051C for ; Tue, 3 Feb 2009 23:30:26 +0000 (UTC) Received: by fxm13 with SMTP id 13so2771511fxm.10 for ; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:30:25 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type :content-transfer-encoding; bh=yQBxl6jjW0KLhAqiK6z5jqAqcqPF8rkpHgR8IT304ig=; b=PUZJzRvCfinr8s0QSHWvgMO8plcygk5bnGLp8k7UA8aQVytPcHoL5pduUMvoeXVbCl NWAXEqdGsZ+Us245ZM6qG+xaWn1KzYZjn17fR2LBO1uC6ix+42YNqZBNY7IrS6q+lZSu xvEywQCR9RoMT9CdN3upXppuKMBX6LTQNrvXY= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=hiNHDvV9LlJvS1OCFl2hKqovXlsiHnaBDmvNI1ErmL3tw1MpFEJuqT8J0XwZzNYg0c laCp9LN0lJCC+zwLVfwpkYn+SxSAh4v4M6InBZM4HVN4ILJ2uVB9HYG4mDGn4sJd4o39 OnR7iZqoZIUW0x1djIpcy+FkiZ9eI3Umkz/Tg= Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Received: by 10.181.37.6 with SMTP id p6mr332467bkj.197.1233703825653; Tue, 03 Feb 2009 15:30:25 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <58965d8a0902031522m5ceeb84ck54161d8fbf62b226@mail.gmail.com> References: <49bf44f10902031129x4f2adb67w9fbbf1f0867d6cc6@mail.gmail.com> <20090203202359.4022edf8@krikkit> <5bdc1c8b0902031232o4d449aa7j14c68fd4dd7d8c75@mail.gmail.com> <20090203222742.33d93b51@krikkit> <49bf44f10902031451g384274a3v54e8257a3bb84470@mail.gmail.com> <4988CF4D.7040503@gmail.com> <58965d8a0902031522m5ceeb84ck54161d8fbf62b226@mail.gmail.com> Date: Tue, 3 Feb 2009 15:30:25 -0800 Message-ID: <49bf44f10902031530r703eba4es5d54838613ca16dd@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 'emerge -avDuN world' doesn't find everything From: Grant To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: df8ae768-cbee-4168-a378-65af5cc27f21 X-Archives-Hash: 446b6a0aa4f786fde0d2c510e0e56583 >>>>> When this was asked a few weeks ago someone then asked why >>>>> --with-bdeps Y isn't the default? This seems to burn nearly everyone >>>>> once in awhile. >>>>> >>>> Because using --with-bdeps y causes unnecessary compilation of packages >>>> that don't need t0 be changed. They won't be used again until the >>>> dependent package is updated, so why waste time rebuilding them in the >>>> interim? >>>> >>>> No one really gets "burned" by this, they just wonder why installed >>>> packages aren't upgraded, nothing stops working. >>>> >>> >>> I added: >>> >>> EMERGE_DEFAULT_OPTS="--with-bdeps n" >>> >>> to make.conf and ran 'emerge --depclean' and it got rid of a bunch of >>> stuff, but I'm still confused by boost. --depclean didn't remove it, >>> 'emerge -avDuN world' doesn't downgrade it even --with-bdeps y, but >>> 'emerge -pv boost' would downgrade it. I also re-emerged twinkle and >>> rb_libtorrent which are the packages that depend on boost, but the >>> result is the same. >>> >>> Also man seems to be broken after that --depclean. When I try to use >>> it, I get errors starting with: >>> >>> sh: /usr/bin/unlzma: No such file or directory >>> >>> - Grant >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> This may help. >> >> root@smoker / # equery belongs /usr/bin/unlzma >> [ Searching for file(s) /usr/bin/unlzma in *... ] >> app-arch/lzma-utils-4.32.7 (/usr/bin/unlzma -> lzma) >> root@smoker / # >> >> I would rebuild that or see why it is not already installed. I would >> think that would be part of system??? I'm not sure tho. > > I seem to recall some switch from LZMA to BZ2 manpages in an > etc-update recently ... emerging lzma-utils fixed it, thank you. I always etc-update as soon as the packages are built. Should lzma-utils be a dependency of something? - Grant