From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-90107-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1LTf2N-0002VF-RS
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 16:19:12 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id DB777E03CA;
	Sun,  1 Feb 2009 16:19:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from fk-out-0910.google.com (fk-out-0910.google.com [209.85.128.184])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9C08AE03CA
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun,  1 Feb 2009 16:19:10 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by fk-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id z23so1050291fkz.2
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:19:10 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:mime-version:received:in-reply-to:references
         :date:message-id:subject:from:to:content-type
         :content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=AB0qPsCs69Leh/Wt44CktI8z6hFSc2iLb96bhtvsP0Y=;
        b=BD5wPDXth7aPXz96XxfnkWtWlf5xZmyrm10ObVUj0bXh1Pvkp8/MKa5BBqubSfpuvZ
         /mgeHxlHL/3UQqu3dV97tvXINcNQ7mPBE2xBKc+HDKXIJutNB+qVWQWPQxL6ErHF365d
         vpQn+3zb9ofNDMIEobDmrRL0kzKsJ5CDIXGxQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=mime-version:in-reply-to:references:date:message-id:subject:from:to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=ClOtsEpGTtMG4MK2tAjd6aanIRkrAIGPZLGqkuTfWmgh+LCmPc9E2yZyIGbajO7xML
         5ODB3boRU81Jv5Q+UvzclWEVX7Yr0UIjCekTUfSdtlPJpjR9dCTbDYn72GfpPNEpQlVZ
         vvM0DaCfHaECaW+tAWXslIVq+SR4GZwiyMqX8=
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Received: by 10.181.137.17 with SMTP id p17mr1306449bkn.163.1233505149841; 
	Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:19:09 -0800 (PST)
In-Reply-To: <glvl2i$pua$1@ger.gmane.org>
References: <49bf44f10901291843y461f506cj9d7dd90a9138578b@mail.gmail.com>
	 <glvl2i$pua$1@ger.gmane.org>
Date: Sun, 1 Feb 2009 08:19:09 -0800
Message-ID: <49bf44f10902010819u1a1e27e8y1b585ca946b4fa31@mail.gmail.com>
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: No RTC kernel support needed?
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: a1a160b4-c35c-4ca7-ae59-c79f0d796fd9
X-Archives-Hash: c0f1cdd8a78dbd9d307ae898c47ed6d3

>> One of my systems needed Real Time Clock -> PC-style 'CMOS' enabled in
>> the kernel to prevent a Hardware Clock error at startup and to make
>> the 'hwclock' command work.  Another of my systems doesn't have Real
>> Time Clock kernel support enabled at all, and yet 'hwclock' works
>> fine.  Does anyone know how that works?
>
> It might have something to do with the "High Resolution Timer Support"
> option (in "Processor type and features".)  Not sure though.

Thank you but none of my systems seem to have that enabled.

- Grant