From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LOF9r-0005C1-Me for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:40:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id AFCFEE029E; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mail-bw0-f21.google.com (mail-bw0-f21.google.com [209.85.218.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 4C6A3E029E for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 17:40:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: by bwz14 with SMTP id 14so6150147bwz.10 for ; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:40:28 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to :subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type :content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=g/8B1aq4L5AHYmH+JeuMxnlLKYevy8xowN/pMPy8qRw=; b=Bso6VhlVD2PRqeK9vhcixbkMZK6s6CoinY57omBI0or3d7y6Eb2OC4I/ykr6vunaIy UhoJ44IVZSx+RQ39kxa/077OXiY1GTvSN04Nw16aLmndA0r7CnBTYF3zYtyt46a+7jtc 1NOGb2sdwwAAewhO3DjTpidROH2IKSDMhAnYM= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version :content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition :references; b=TcMg6LPDp6NHC7gRuzBMDb4o7/zd/7WzCpwmPB+MI96kug/YxPuDxpsgJejxUFo+re qHOT49v74xPScI0/gSGNHuR1FVF1dI/moMKCFS+/MV9YyMWfy42NayZgtxn9mCORKQau 2RzjOsXduIafD+r0qmtYGpWmoQxG8p7y2XKkY= Received: by 10.181.144.11 with SMTP id w11mr1330667bkn.81.1232214028665; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:40:28 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.180.208.18 with HTTP; Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:40:28 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49bf44f10901170940u697ba542t4eebe4afe6dd8eab@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 17 Jan 2009 09:40:28 -0800 From: Grant To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Restricting Firefox website access In-Reply-To: <87d4elnb9m.fsf@newsguy.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <49bf44f10901071344l3f081b8dmaa6353b41fb59f4@mail.gmail.com> <58965d8a0901071354l76bea08o328361031ff58ac8@mail.gmail.com> <854dca5c0901081257u25c6dee0j7871901221592a95@mail.gmail.com> <49bf44f10901091040t6c1920c4kbd504920e256ac20@mail.gmail.com> <20090110101854.4ed996d1@fraggod.net> <49bf44f10901100948x5ad0087ag93feadefce0385ad@mail.gmail.com> <20090111070536.52dece68@coercion> <49bf44f10901162134o79953e71y393c6a340c398dbe@mail.gmail.com> <3BC0E9C7-E397-43C8-96C1-1798ED64EBCB@stellar.eclipse.co.uk> <87d4elnb9m.fsf@newsguy.com> X-Archives-Salt: dc78f452-6c27-4583-bbdd-39520ad9a5ac X-Archives-Hash: 1c7d609ec2ebdf3895f2c6b1ac8652ce >> But I had expected Squid + module to be the answer, and no-one >> mentioned it. A couple of clowns mentioned OpenDNS, and DansGuardian >> was the only serious reply I got, so you might want to look at that, >> too. >> http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/gentoo/user/175114 >> >> I really should be implementing this internet filtering this weekend. > > Did privoxy go out of business... or just not suitable for the need? > > I used to use it a few yrs ago but haven't had the need for quite a > while now. What is the advantage of privoxy over squid? Maybe simplicity? - Grant