From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1JAwSy-0003Qv-UE for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 05 Jan 2008 00:00:45 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with SMTP id m04NwEoS014687; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:58:14 GMT Received: from wa-out-1112.google.com (wa-out-1112.google.com [209.85.146.181]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.2/8.14.0) with ESMTP id m04NrcnX009664 for ; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 23:53:39 GMT Received: by wa-out-1112.google.com with SMTP id k34so10637388wah.10 for ; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:53:38 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; bh=iySgj5Xu2+00Q4sw/sXZBAt665i4dl+VyU48tSg8/4Y=; b=ma8R/YiaXpDMBQb/gGnvQxBadQINp9icMy+QBvW3txB0Ak2DOWdjrGmrpzWR1OGw6NJzzJkJ3A6WIkwlq+1NU6zpjfe1Z0w7KRJMNlTJ8oQq876o2TnoDT9kkYPNSbhHpuHZPxK/Fn6ocFIVjiHv7AIUtNI4nF1OOTUxTAPq9bQ= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=VB0Z6ZvV7SEgM1e/8YxwX+N0NPgfanymaWoLDYabSrcqJqUdeuejOeKC+zTDf2ALWeer26aTjnw24rOh65pVZWR1zOGmDs9e2gPA5/z5oF9sx38h7i/GPAuz8V8uuhL7b7TjDJ2bFY0So97vq5gX0GtZtIXKT08UDHJCe2vUilU= Received: by 10.114.13.1 with SMTP id 1mr18399951wam.74.1199490818009; Fri, 04 Jan 2008 15:53:38 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.115.110.15 with HTTP; Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:53:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49bf44f10801041553t672a8c9bi5deaeed766757156@mail.gmail.com> Date: Fri, 4 Jan 2008 15:53:37 -0800 From: Grant To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Need ebuild no longer in Portage In-Reply-To: Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <49bf44f10801032222s5dc057d2k660eb2b69313f835@mail.gmail.com> <200801040729.16458.dirk.heinrichs.ext@nsn.com> <1199429845.24574.21.camel@rattus> <49bf44f10801040758h404d2957yf32bf5bae1bf5957@mail.gmail.com> <20080104194623.f4475819.i92guboj@terra.es> <49bf44f10801041101y1513bafey369d626dc0a603c1@mail.gmail.com> <49bf44f10801041110k4e4b9d77tdb9ac001b0cec6b1@mail.gmail.com> <49bf44f10801041439i1c732440v44037b7fdc24dcba@mail.gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 46b89f4f-e170-4d54-994b-336a218e0fb8 X-Archives-Hash: 25c9061a1decc6f93836ec93ef21c496 > >> ISTR that "make prepare" isn't sufficient. You have to do a > >> "make". IIRC, you can kill it once it starts compiling "real > >> code". > > > > I can't keep up with the acronyms > > I seem to recall. :) > > > but I did a full make and I still get the same error. Should > > I be booted into the same kernel that /usr/src/linux points to > > when compiling nvidia-modules? > > I didn't think that was required, but that's probably how I've > always done it, so it's worth a shot. Same result unfortunately. Is it possible that this version of nvidia-drivers isn't compatible with 2.6.23? - Grant -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list