From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] {OT} Strange apache2 access_log entries
Date: Wed, 26 Sep 2007 19:25:23 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49bf44f10709261925k1eb61a00ye420df0f1c6f72d5@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20070926182419.2c8a13cb@pascal.spore.ath.cx>
> > Does anyone else get entries like this in their apache2 access_log:
> >
> > 127.0.0.1 - - [26/Sep/2007:03:10:08 -0700] "GET /" 400 470
> >
> > I get a whole slew of them every day. They always show up in batches
> > and each entry in a batch is logged at almost the same second.
> That make sense, since 400 means 'bad request' the culprit probably
> fails a preset number of times and then gives up. Perhaps 127.0.0.1 is
> the setting for something in the absence of a sane configuration - in
> other words, it might be tricky to track this one down. You'll have to
> let us know what gurific sleuthing techniques you employ to track down
> the bad guys.
What do you mean by "bad guys"?
I made a mistake in my initial post. The 127.0.0.1 entries always
show up in ssl_access_log, not access_log.
Also, I noticed that a huge block of them always appears at the very
beginning of each day's ssl_access_log at exactly 3:10AM.
> You should perhaps use combined logging so you get more information,
> like the user agent and such. right now you're using 'common' logging
> which has the additional disadvantage that it doesn't give you
> particularly useful information if you decide to use a statistical
> analyzer like awstats on your archive of logs from the past umpteen
> years. The user agent might be useful for debugging purposes.
I switched ssl_access_log temporarily to the combined format, and it
was definitely working, but the 127.0.0.1 error looked exactly as it
did in common format with no extra information.
> You might also consider running tcpdump for a few hours or so, or
> something, and have it watch for that port and interface and run ps or
> something if you get output from it. Or use iptables logging for the
> job, if you'd rather do that.
Any specific commands or even just certain parameters I should look into?
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2007-09-27 2:39 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 17+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2007-09-26 20:30 [gentoo-user] {OT} Strange apache2 access_log entries Grant
2007-09-26 22:48 ` Albert Hopkins
2007-09-27 1:51 ` Grant
2007-09-27 2:44 ` Albert Hopkins
2007-09-27 4:44 ` Grant
2007-09-27 5:28 ` Szénási István
2007-09-27 14:10 ` Grant
2007-09-27 14:30 ` Szénási István
2007-09-27 3:14 ` Daniel Iliev
2007-09-27 3:28 ` [gentoo-user] {OT} [typo] " Daniel Iliev
2007-09-27 7:22 ` [gentoo-user] {OT} " Neil Bothwick
2007-09-27 14:22 ` Grant
[not found] ` <20070926182419.2c8a13cb@pascal.spore.ath.cx>
2007-09-27 2:25 ` Grant [this message]
2007-09-27 6:39 ` Naga
2007-09-27 14:39 ` Grant
2007-09-28 14:17 ` [gentoo-user] " Grant
2007-09-29 17:27 ` Grant
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49bf44f10709261925k1eb61a00ye420df0f1c6f72d5@mail.gmail.com \
--to=emailgrant@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox