From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
	by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-60481-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
	id 1HL9C9-0003Mk-Td
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:33:02 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l1P2VRNa018330;
	Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:31:27 GMT
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.235])
	by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l1P2ROoK013682
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:27:24 GMT
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so1510351wxd
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:27:23 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=tHrC7DlYQZ2XEQHDHC2DFjRTGub9ezH8uXaIe32nriS6LT5JPIWcMGwtZJM8GjHHk3/fUCczd/e9D8ApqF8ex3GcNdvGpAPoNtq12ld+7xUUGD1dW1Q5VNSYh6aHsoTv8TuyLc4yFJt4tJ8jyEs4XoKW64N5v5e5rZyAu2XvjwQ=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=beta;
        h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
        b=VlMBkjm5nYGEbm/A8s0ZQW2Cy46otJKmGr09wRUcRMHCo9CWVW1CNQAKW/ESTECSDpNa4tyZIUtPpd7f5H8xEuhI/LBthK7afkoPWc5kLiID/okckbjxhMw5oseJxrj+JpeZjP+JLDlzab9gmqWgq4T0q1E+k/pf2T3IyZ+fwV0=
Received: by 10.114.151.13 with SMTP id y13mr197589wad.1172370443440;
        Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:27:23 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.176.15 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:27:23 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49bf44f10702241827l63defcdbk7c383845dee84586@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:27:23 -0800
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Portage wants to re-emerge old kernel sources
In-Reply-To: <200702232358.16535.harmgeerts@home.nl>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <49bf44f10702220616w7e397153m524b2644388603ff@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200702232055.22040.bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
	 <49bf44f10702231446w31468bb8x9a484571ac81608c@mail.gmail.com>
	 <200702232358.16535.harmgeerts@home.nl>
X-Archives-Salt: 9a8ad43c-f330-418d-9338-604eecb1638e
X-Archives-Hash: e411eda9fa019521af3822cec5ddc92a

> > > > It is true then that emerge --depclean never unmerges slotted packages?
> > >
> > > Just how would portage know that an old slot is no longer needed? Just
> > > because a newer version is installed doesn't mean it's been compiled or
> > > that the old is no longer needed (you might need to compile some package
> > > against the old that fails to compile against the new)...
> > >
> > > For the more general case slot deps aren't allowed in the tree yet so
> > > it's not all that easy to figure out which slots are in use. You do risk
> > > breaking your system by pruning the wrong package..
> >
> > Ok, yes, slot deps sounds like what I'm after here.  Is there a
> > portage command I can run to see which packages are installed in more
> > than one slot?  I'm having disk space problems on my laptop.
>
> emerge -Pp
>
> Though you should never run that without --pretend cause that will destroy
> your system.

Ok, I guess this is where I either stop or find out if udept works.

- Grant
-- 
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list