From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1HL94D-00070N-8x for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:24:49 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l1P2NdP3012184; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:23:39 GMT Received: from nz-out-0506.google.com (nz-out-0506.google.com [64.233.162.236]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l1P2JLRO007450 for ; Sun, 25 Feb 2007 02:19:21 GMT Received: by nz-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id s1so811314nze for ; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:19:21 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=a6625z/C6Qwk943vIiZ+ltE1REPNGzL3u+CFL5XFLmJ59/fpltHpQaSkUAqsGzBGnQ1mjIDmck2FBLmgwxC1QxxBRMjGxZVrRGynq07OsiQ/VaEwMv9MRMKpnPuYTlw/+13XneOv30P9o6JHuB2+yb+GmYVE6LT2hkRlOiX0Piw= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=beta; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=DOxSky0X7WxLSMQrvR4ed2CP92+ZNqWtBl7sVrXvA+acW+fKeUWZtxq0AqZKtgHcfMa+O7hzPu5d3MFFWNCi/w/QgzqqyYsprdxkT2Y5beII9AEFAUakIhmJuZBfFS1W7/3O8cmXF7oXTfOelDNiwE24aIyEBc8xyklELv2fEv8= Received: by 10.115.58.1 with SMTP id l1mr196376wak.1172369960792; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:19:20 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.114.176.15 with HTTP; Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:19:20 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49bf44f10702241819q687bdda1le058ab7c27c60b77@mail.gmail.com> Date: Sat, 24 Feb 2007 18:19:20 -0800 From: Grant To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Bon Echo (why?) In-Reply-To: <45E0B6C6.7090700@gmail.com> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <45E0970D.7010000@gmail.com> <45E0B6C6.7090700@gmail.com> X-Archives-Salt: 4d26ac7a-6133-4b06-a93d-b104fb5395cc X-Archives-Hash: c02e0ad74cc2f6c8fca4742d7c90a2c4 > >> As you all know, Firefox 2.0.0.2 is stable on x86 in Portage. When one > >> emerges it, Gnome menu call, and the software calls itself (in about > >> box) Bon Echo (the codename of Firefox 2 development tree). Why? > >> > > > > Some licensing BS or other. > > > > > >> Is really development version of Firefox in Portage, or what? > >> > > > > If you want it to call itself "Firefox" add mozbranding to your > > USE flags. > > > > > Thanks. I think it is not a good idea to call Firefox (for some branding > issue) its development codename. Maybe Gentoo should use Debian's > Iceweasel name. I agree. It's confusing that the brand-less name is the same as the development name. - Grant -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list