From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-60425-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1HKjGU-0000Xi-2V
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:51:46 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with SMTP id l1NMoTm4001768;
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:50:29 GMT
Received: from wr-out-0506.google.com (wr-out-0506.google.com [64.233.184.239])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.14.0/8.14.0) with ESMTP id l1NMkCsE029588
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 22:46:12 GMT
Received: by wr-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i7so771689wra
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:46:12 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=relaxed/relaxed;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=s2TkUbPUD6vbegMsPa7mB9LG9nH2MHhJO4qU0j0QkaqZ2mH128zIQrEtzyW+c1G40kkVJCDrdYF76+bJd2xJzgWftKBXFbbDEFEtfeYvYfRJiBL4YLmQscNr1LSYn6cWgh+zb1Od+3WoLKQcSfUfkhZKd89DaVNvxuF6P3jKrp0=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
d=gmail.com; s=beta;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=EIaNLXvA2o21ULQ+Z5dUo9MxPsU+h0p0t1NVOjxiZjV63pHzcBiQuf/JgkDVhZM66UL6P1/XIfsJmKrWebdn7EQBP1GIVs54dMiYyjrcAb0hVNET8iW++3RadFQ7t+PaQTNdz6NCBY9HnPNUVT0090+UBGiwielPn07caYXidK8=
Received: by 10.114.145.1 with SMTP id s1mr61214wad.1172270767810;
Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.114.176.15 with HTTP; Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:46:07 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49bf44f10702231446w31468bb8x9a484571ac81608c@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 23 Feb 2007 14:46:07 -0800
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Portage wants to re-emerge old kernel sources
In-Reply-To: <200702232055.22040.bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <49bf44f10702220616w7e397153m524b2644388603ff@mail.gmail.com>
<1172188280.22948.8.camel@marcec.huntemann.uni-oldenburg.de>
<49bf44f10702230949ld61e0c5x4a0f85ef295e188f@mail.gmail.com>
<200702232055.22040.bo.andresen@zlin.dk>
X-Archives-Salt: db26f395-c584-491f-96f3-27f3a14c9473
X-Archives-Hash: 1056a3f09757adc2d324224598d37857
> > It is true then that emerge --depclean never unmerges slotted packages?
>
> Just how would portage know that an old slot is no longer needed? Just because
> a newer version is installed doesn't mean it's been compiled or that the old
> is no longer needed (you might need to compile some package against the old
> that fails to compile against the new)...
>
> For the more general case slot deps aren't allowed in the tree yet so it's not
> all that easy to figure out which slots are in use. You do risk breaking your
> system by pruning the wrong package..
Ok, yes, slot deps sounds like what I'm after here. Is there a
portage command I can run to see which packages are installed in more
than one slot? I'm having disk space problems on my laptop.
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list