From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org) by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62) (envelope-from ) id 1GxFqZ-0006eu-L2 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:48:00 +0000 Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kBL4jnTB022009; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:45:49 GMT Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.226]) by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBL4hbMV010627 for ; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:43:38 GMT Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so3445640wxd for ; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:43:37 -0800 (PST) DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws; s=beta; d=gmail.com; h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references; b=FlVHoan6LOa+f2triuWW5J06/W7BfI/JCAMIXB7IXn47Wqdtt4okNdY0ZUQzGwckuBttjQ55BUAQYqiGN701rrR2Tv0uOQpJ8Gi0PFkiF1KFkgcxFKHSQ0f7ZvGpVeCv2ypz52Y1v9fEkFuGH1Fi6SnYN3O8Enrgr/74UE3xlA8= Received: by 10.90.117.15 with SMTP id p15mr8055671agc.1166676217482; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:43:37 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.90.56.10 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:43:37 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49bf44f10612202043g31463015nf6e5a5b9d521971a@mail.gmail.com> Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:43:37 -0800 From: Grant To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo healthy? In-Reply-To: <20061220230326.GN21525@woodpecker.gentoo.org> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline References: <49bf44f10612180647g6ac243ebm9cfa8b79a5aeb3b5@mail.gmail.com> <200612182155.11490.mrugeshkarnik@gmail.com> <49bf44f10612191758q758d484fh4f783b651e809b06@mail.gmail.com> <45889E9D.4020508@gmail.com> <20061220230326.GN21525@woodpecker.gentoo.org> X-Archives-Salt: caae9cba-6142-4419-aaee-2c6b4b5186d5 X-Archives-Hash: be43fbe46d2731103831f64a9d0bd62a > > Is the non-profit organization side of Gentoo healthy? My brief Google > > session does not reveal anything that suggests it is not, but if somebody > > can and may comment on this, please do so. > What do you mean by healthy? There's a number of important issues the > Trustees have to work out but we're getting lots (for some value of > lots) of donations, improving conference attendance etc. > > The non-profit organisation haven't existed very long so there's > obviously going to be a number of issues still to be worked out but all > in all I think it's getting better. But if you'd be so kind as to define > what you mean by healthy I'm sure I could help with more insights. Well I'll give up on my number of users vs. active development study unless anyone else is interested. I seem to be the only one. Seems like the right thing to do. - Grant -- gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list