From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from lists.gentoo.org ([140.105.134.102] helo=robin.gentoo.org)
by nuthatch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.62)
(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-56909-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@gentoo.org>)
id 1GxFqZ-0006eu-L2
for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:48:00 +0000
Received: from robin.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with SMTP id kBL4jnTB022009;
Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:45:49 GMT
Received: from wx-out-0506.google.com (wx-out-0506.google.com [66.249.82.226])
by robin.gentoo.org (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id kBL4hbMV010627
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Thu, 21 Dec 2006 04:43:38 GMT
Received: by wx-out-0506.google.com with SMTP id i30so3445640wxd
for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:43:37 -0800 (PST)
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; q=dns; c=nofws;
s=beta; d=gmail.com;
h=received:message-id:date:from:to:subject:in-reply-to:mime-version:content-type:content-transfer-encoding:content-disposition:references;
b=FlVHoan6LOa+f2triuWW5J06/W7BfI/JCAMIXB7IXn47Wqdtt4okNdY0ZUQzGwckuBttjQ55BUAQYqiGN701rrR2Tv0uOQpJ8Gi0PFkiF1KFkgcxFKHSQ0f7ZvGpVeCv2ypz52Y1v9fEkFuGH1Fi6SnYN3O8Enrgr/74UE3xlA8=
Received: by 10.90.117.15 with SMTP id p15mr8055671agc.1166676217482;
Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:43:37 -0800 (PST)
Received: by 10.90.56.10 with HTTP; Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:43:37 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <49bf44f10612202043g31463015nf6e5a5b9d521971a@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 20 Dec 2006 20:43:37 -0800
From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Is Gentoo healthy?
In-Reply-To: <20061220230326.GN21525@woodpecker.gentoo.org>
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Content-Disposition: inline
References: <49bf44f10612180647g6ac243ebm9cfa8b79a5aeb3b5@mail.gmail.com>
<200612182155.11490.mrugeshkarnik@gmail.com>
<49bf44f10612191758q758d484fh4f783b651e809b06@mail.gmail.com>
<45889E9D.4020508@gmail.com> <op.tkupc20ev2ynd8@gaktux>
<20061220230326.GN21525@woodpecker.gentoo.org>
X-Archives-Salt: caae9cba-6142-4419-aaee-2c6b4b5186d5
X-Archives-Hash: be43fbe46d2731103831f64a9d0bd62a
> > Is the non-profit organization side of Gentoo healthy? My brief Google
> > session does not reveal anything that suggests it is not, but if somebody
> > can and may comment on this, please do so.
> What do you mean by healthy? There's a number of important issues the
> Trustees have to work out but we're getting lots (for some value of
> lots) of donations, improving conference attendance etc.
>
> The non-profit organisation haven't existed very long so there's
> obviously going to be a number of issues still to be worked out but all
> in all I think it's getting better. But if you'd be so kind as to define
> what you mean by healthy I'm sure I could help with more insights.
Well I'll give up on my number of users vs. active development study
unless anyone else is interested. I seem to be the only one. Seems
like the right thing to do.
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list