From: Grant <emailgrant@gmail.com>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] 64-bit system?
Date: Tue, 26 Sep 2006 08:30:00 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <49bf44f10609260830r1ac69953j97533ecb2fc02c8a@mail.gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200609190746.06644.Gentoo@kraszewscy.net>
> > You'll only notice a speed increase with applications that need to
> > caculate very large numbers, like encryption keys and certain
> > scientific apps. Everything else will basically run just as fast in
> > 32-bit mode as it will in 64-bit. There are exceptions in certain
> > media encoders that don't have hardware optimizations for 64-bit, that
> > may actually run faster as 32-bit apps.
>
> Well, the registers are not only twice longer, but there is twice as much of
> them as in 32-bit. And THIS is what optimising compilers are fond of. More
> registers mean less in-memory temporary variables, which in turn means less
> memory accesses. This gives speed improvement. For SMP systems it gives huge
> difference - as the memory is shared between CPUs and they must fight for it.
>
> I have an amd64 system for over a year (or is it 2-yrs?). I had some glitches:
>
> * Need to use binary 32-bit firefox to have flash - still have problems with
> some fonts not appearing in flash
> * Need to use 32-bit java to make 32-bit OpenOffice happy
> * Some forensic packages won't compile on 64-bit due to bad coding techniques
>
> But besides that - my AMD64 3000+ just rocks. I had definitely much more
> problems with 64-bit XP, but since getting rid of it (XP not problems) I am
> fully 64-bit positive :D
That's what I just bought. A Sempron64 3000+. So, if there isn't an
amd64 package available, I can always use x86? Does portage make it
easy to do this?
- Grant
--
gentoo-user@gentoo.org mailing list
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2006-09-26 15:40 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2006-09-18 14:18 [gentoo-user] 64-bit system? Grant
2006-09-18 11:40 ` Rafael Barrera Oro
2006-09-18 15:10 ` alain.didierjean
2006-09-19 5:36 ` Drew
2006-09-18 15:49 ` Richard Fish
2006-09-18 16:30 ` Grant
2006-09-18 16:39 ` Thomas T. Veldhouse
2006-09-19 5:46 ` Pawel Kraszewski
2006-09-26 15:30 ` Grant [this message]
2006-09-28 3:53 ` Drew
2006-09-18 19:46 ` Gian Domeni Calgeer
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=49bf44f10609260830r1ac69953j97533ecb2fc02c8a@mail.gmail.com \
--to=emailgrant@gmail.com \
--cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox