public inbox for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Thomas Kahle <tom111@gmx.de>
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2
Date: Fri, 03 Apr 2009 12:24:08 +0200	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <49D5E3C8.20209@gmx.de> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <1238747642.49d5c9fa80017@imp.free.fr>

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1171 bytes --]

alain.didierjean@free.fr wrote:
> Has one of you guys already switched from gcc-4.1.2 to gcc-4.3.2 and
> performed  "emerge system" ?
> What gives ? Any problem ? Is it worth it right now ? Please tell...
> 
> --
>  ~adj~
> 

Yes, I did it at the beginning of the year, it was more or less
painfree. There were a couple of compile failures with stable packages
when rebuilding the world, but typically these are already fixed and in
bugzilla, so you can go ahead by installing the ~x86 package. (See
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=245160 for a tracker of the packages)
I did not notice any difference in using the system everyday, I did it
only because I can use -march=core2 now and I wanted to work with the
newer gcc when programming other things.
You should follow the upgrade guide for maximal pleasure:
http://www.gentoo.org/doc/en/gcc-upgrading.xml

hope to help
Thom


-- 
Thomas Kahle

The fundamental theorem of algebra is open source. Like any other
mathematical theorem it can be applied free of charge and everybody
has access to its proof and can convince himself how it works. Why
should software be any different?


[-- Attachment #2: OpenPGP digital signature --]
[-- Type: application/pgp-signature, Size: 261 bytes --]

  reply	other threads:[~2009-04-03 10:31 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 24+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2009-04-03  8:34 [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2 alain.didierjean
2009-04-03 10:24 ` Thomas Kahle [this message]
2009-04-03 12:17 ` Masood Ahmed
2009-04-03 21:15   ` Neil Bothwick
2009-04-03 21:28     ` Jerry McBride
2009-04-04  5:43   ` Mike Kazantsev
2009-04-04  8:28     ` Graham Murray
2009-04-03 14:53 ` alain.didierjean
2009-04-04  7:03 ` Christopher Walters
2009-04-06  6:02 ` Joseph
2009-04-06  8:56   ` [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2 Nikos Chantziaras
2009-04-06 16:35     ` Joseph
2009-04-06 20:07       ` Neil Bothwick
2009-04-06 20:28         ` Joseph
2009-04-06 20:37           ` Paul Hartman
2009-04-06 22:20           ` Neil Bothwick
2009-04-06 16:53     ` Jarry
2009-04-06 17:52       ` Joseph
2009-04-07  2:53       ` Nikos Chantziaras
2009-04-07  1:00   ` [gentoo-user] GCC-4.3.2 Jorge Morais
2009-04-07  2:19     ` Joseph
2009-04-07 14:42       ` Mike Kazantsev
2009-04-07 16:48       ` Arttu V.
2009-04-07 18:07         ` Joseph

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=49D5E3C8.20209@gmx.de \
    --to=tom111@gmx.de \
    --cc=gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox