From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LjKJQ-0005QH-F6 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:25:32 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4158E04B2; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: from static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de (static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de [78.46.48.21]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801C9E04B2 for ; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:25:30 +0000 (UTC) Received: by static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1007) id 8F9701737D8; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:25:34 +0100 (CET) X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on 0815-web.localdomain X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RECEIVED, NO_RELAYS,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.2.1 Message-ID: <49BEC3C6.3020405@j-schmitz.net> Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:25:26 +0100 From: Justin User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090221) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] are blocks now "OK" with portage-2.1.6.7 ? References: In-Reply-To: X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="------------enig78945B52A48CA92395BA22DF" X-Archives-Salt: ce3190e0-4526-4990-8bc5-c9221a6d6611 X-Archives-Hash: 51591d886619aab4f3f526f5193511f3 This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156) --------------enig78945B52A48CA92395BA22DF Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Allan Gottlieb wrote: > Gnome-light recently went stable on x86 so my last emerge world produce= d > a long list of packages to merge. Fine. >=20 > At the end it says >=20 > Total: 93 packages (87 upgrades, 4 new, 2 reinstalls), Size of download= s: 223,796 kB > Conflict: 3 blocks > Portage tree and overlays: > [0] /usr/portage > [?] indicates that the source repository could not be determined >=20 > Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No] =20 >=20 > Since it offers to merge and there are no B's in the list, I assume > this version of portage resolved the blockage. However, there are > nearly a hundred packages and some of them are important so I would lik= e > to confirm that it is OK to let portage merge these. >=20 > thanks, > allan >=20 >=20 One of the big steps which are in the newer portage is version is the enh= anced blocker resolution. So uit should go easy with your update. I am running the gnome-2.24* package sin= ce along time and i was always fine. --------------enig78945B52A48CA92395BA22DF Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc" Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc" -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux) iEYEARECAAYFAkm+w8YACgkQgAnW8HDreRYBUwCgm/BxEQM1YfaArLFevEV6hFxp gJcAnjM48ITfjkQvDWZ0+8OL7Y0oPlYe =d9kJ -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --------------enig78945B52A48CA92395BA22DF--