From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([208.92.234.80] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-91978-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1LjKJQ-0005QH-F6
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:25:32 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id B4158E04B2;
	Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de (static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de [78.46.48.21])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 801C9E04B2
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 21:25:30 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by static.21.48.46.78.clients.your-server.de (Postfix, from userid 1007)
	id 8F9701737D8; Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:25:34 +0100 (CET)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.2.1 (2007-05-02) on 0815-web.localdomain
X-Spam-Level: 
X-Spam-Status: No, score=-102.8 required=5.0 tests=AWL,BAYES_00,NO_RECEIVED,
	NO_RELAYS,USER_IN_WHITELIST autolearn=ham version=3.2.1
Message-ID: <49BEC3C6.3020405@j-schmitz.net>
Date: Mon, 16 Mar 2009 22:25:26 +0100
From: Justin <justin@j-schmitz.net>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090221)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] are blocks now "OK" with portage-2.1.6.7 ?
References: <yu97i2pcgfg.fsf@nyu.edu>
In-Reply-To: <yu97i2pcgfg.fsf@nyu.edu>
X-Enigmail-Version: 0.95.7
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
 protocol="application/pgp-signature";
 boundary="------------enig78945B52A48CA92395BA22DF"
X-Archives-Salt: ce3190e0-4526-4990-8bc5-c9221a6d6611
X-Archives-Hash: 51591d886619aab4f3f526f5193511f3

This is an OpenPGP/MIME signed message (RFC 2440 and 3156)
--------------enig78945B52A48CA92395BA22DF
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

Allan Gottlieb wrote:
> Gnome-light recently went stable on x86 so my last emerge world produce=
d
> a long list of packages to merge.  Fine.
>=20
> At the end it says
>=20
> Total: 93 packages (87 upgrades, 4 new, 2 reinstalls), Size of download=
s: 223,796 kB
> Conflict: 3 blocks
> Portage tree and overlays:
>  [0] /usr/portage
>  [?] indicates that the source repository could not be determined
>=20
> Would you like to merge these packages? [Yes/No]     =20
>=20
> Since it offers to merge and there are no B's in the list, I assume
> this version of portage resolved the blockage.  However, there are
> nearly a hundred packages and some of them are important so I would lik=
e
> to confirm that it is OK to let portage merge these.
>=20
> thanks,
> allan
>=20
>=20

One of the big steps which are in the newer portage is version is the enh=
anced blocker resolution. So uit
should go easy with your update. I am running the gnome-2.24* package sin=
ce along time and i was always fine.


--------------enig78945B52A48CA92395BA22DF
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature; name="signature.asc"
Content-Description: OpenPGP digital signature
Content-Disposition: attachment; filename="signature.asc"

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.9 (GNU/Linux)

iEYEARECAAYFAkm+w8YACgkQgAnW8HDreRYBUwCgm/BxEQM1YfaArLFevEV6hFxp
gJcAnjM48ITfjkQvDWZ0+8OL7Y0oPlYe
=d9kJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--------------enig78945B52A48CA92395BA22DF--