From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1Ld6YF-0005ai-U8 for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:31:08 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id CE6B1E029B; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: from rv-out-0708.google.com (rv-out-0708.google.com [209.85.198.246]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A2933E029B for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 17:31:06 +0000 (UTC) Received: by rv-out-0708.google.com with SMTP id f25so1165193rvb.46 for ; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:31:06 -0800 (PST) DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to :content-type:content-transfer-encoding; bh=/iz8boSW79ZZV6YB4DjYjoaXWlvljWQImxO4pllY+7k=; b=RKM0+SjA4F22EkMCcvAZqZ9/KXSg9bBNJQnJt+qVjbxV3lwvp59ErcIf9ro2kFhNwk yt612g5HbL+2EG0bKJvwh2pQx6WUziHLp1QY7VY0WLjTbRi54XCulEW1Rw+ZyxdZUaAi BQ5WehnydlgTZ2IzDNZmwOGRM+YY8a+ebibeI= DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws; d=gmail.com; s=gamma; h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding; b=QDSH+PC2YqIskzKosZflExGL+lH3l4IulZqGhNaFZhQBJx5zmWqenbdu3ITbUt4yI9 aWSLlOA4nDf9AswyHXfCmOmIbx4V/4qVvx+S4uT8N20zSojrjDOv9gXmDUorGnDxmwhE M8F/qVOvtX7Nf0xMfuAq7vmdcKYkiSl8pvqY4= Received: by 10.141.53.18 with SMTP id f18mr1303636rvk.188.1235755866240; Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:31:06 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?4.230.99.147? ([4.230.99.147]) by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id g14sm4362156rvb.0.2009.02.27.09.31.03 (version=SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5); Fri, 27 Feb 2009 09:31:05 -0800 (PST) Message-ID: <49A82351.8090009@gmail.com> Date: Fri, 27 Feb 2009 11:30:57 -0600 From: Dale User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; U; Linux i686; en-US; rv:1.8.1.19) Gecko/20081227 SeaMonkey/1.1.14 Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: Which USB device on which controller? References: <49bf44f10902261934l1d33ff17nd64fbfaff4d5b1a3@mail.gmail.com> <49A763C4.5010201@gmail.com> <49bf44f10902262142u68d0a789g336e23849987494d@mail.gmail.com> <49A78BA0.8030602@gmail.com> <49bf44f10902270737s7cd41da0t734fdc00d5c67a73@mail.gmail.com> <49A80CEE.5000200@gmail.com> <49bf44f10902270900q2ec748f6p489fc1839bf32f7d@mail.gmail.com> In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Archives-Salt: c0314193-280b-415c-938c-8b8ed8f5be72 X-Archives-Hash: e0b9488cc9d5360195a106916def2e0c Grant Edwards wrote: > On 2009-02-27, Grant wrote: > > >> I'm looking at the box of one of the webcams and it says "USB 2.0 >> compatible". >> > > A USB 1.1 device _is_ "USB 2.0 compatible" because a USB 2.0 > will slow down and run at 1.1 speed. Does the device say it's > "high speed" USB? "USB 2.0 compatible" generally means it's a > USB 1.1 device. > > >> It's not a cable problem because the cable is built right into >> the webcam. I'm not trying to get the webcam to go faster >> back and forth to the controller, I just need to make sure I >> don't have both webcams on the same OHCI (1.1) USB controller. >> I would think buying a USB expansion card would work, but I >> have an EHCI (2.0) controller on this system and a second OHCI >> (1.1) controller. >> >> Does anyone have any idea on this. It really doesn't make sense. >> > > Sounds like it's a 1.1 device to me. > > Yep, that's what it sounds like to me too. Dale :-) :-)