From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org)
	by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60)
	(envelope-from <gentoo-user+bounces-90805-garchives=archives.gentoo.org@lists.gentoo.org>)
	id 1LWkie-0001o1-DY
	for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:59:36 +0000
Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 6179DE0321;
	Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:59:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from rn-out-0910.google.com (rn-out-0910.google.com [64.233.170.191])
	by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 419ADE0321
	for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Tue, 10 Feb 2009 04:59:35 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by rn-out-0910.google.com with SMTP id k1so1632293rnd.14
        for <gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>; Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:59:35 -0800 (PST)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=domainkey-signature:received:received:message-id:date:from
         :user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references:in-reply-to
         :content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        bh=KYjje0yR8s1x9VafOEMnasD/RNH7tJ1WRoVyYSe0eZo=;
        b=YSVPQtCe1aWhWjCjhMbQu9jQLqbX3lZygWp6aKNLtIb/TjFXmrEjsrXoCR12yizm7+
         5pW4DA/oUbncbEZX/T2DSmz4sVKOHaxO2HfZnfAamm0I0VkVzslcvDDi6sI2dlqb66wp
         fryE3TfvfuarBkI4XhhD5HEz53jrS2nOxQ59g=
DomainKey-Signature: a=rsa-sha1; c=nofws;
        d=gmail.com; s=gamma;
        h=message-id:date:from:user-agent:mime-version:to:subject:references
         :in-reply-to:content-type:content-transfer-encoding;
        b=Xv+bQVYZzMuCTK7h7TQgcgGev93x8JQxqwcefw+hMSyiJLUIi/Pl1VBH0XNbpHL+mH
         r6BKpoz8vkCDrK8T09eYc635hIspGgMlxv+WgY6KS9HaBLkck1ZpfaLFkL+9EzaVftcI
         lUXf9xNaUK96NZaAHjLQVPax8pmsPh8wUMaSQ=
Received: by 10.90.26.9 with SMTP id 9mr503802agz.84.1234241974841;
        Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:59:34 -0800 (PST)
Received: from gentoo-everex.local (cpe-72-185-51-230.tampabay.res.rr.com [72.185.51.230])
        by mx.google.com with ESMTPS id 34sm2115841yxm.25.2009.02.09.20.59.33
        (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=RC4-MD5);
        Mon, 09 Feb 2009 20:59:34 -0800 (PST)
Message-ID: <499109B3.1050100@gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 09 Feb 2009 23:59:31 -0500
From: Saphirus Sage <saphirus497@gmail.com>
User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20081231)
Precedence: bulk
List-Post: <mailto:gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Help: <mailto:gentoo-user+help@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+unsubscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Subscribe: <mailto:gentoo-user+subscribe@lists.gentoo.org>
List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail <gentoo-user.gentoo.org>
X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org
Subject: Re: [gentoo-user]  The Linux Ecosystem (with funny references to
 Gentoo vs Canonical)
References: <gmqj02$7i2$1@ger.gmane.org>
In-Reply-To: <gmqj02$7i2$1@ger.gmane.org>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Archives-Salt: ab61a0db-f100-4718-8445-441f650115f1
X-Archives-Hash: b02520086ee8727637048efe047dcf45

Nikos Chantziaras wrote:
> http://video.linuxfoundation.org/video/1069
>
> I found it quite interesting that even Gentoo beat Canonical in the
> amount of patches contributed upstream...
>
>
Good find, I actually didn't know about E-Trade using Gentoo servers. I
don't think it should be too surprising that Gentoo would contribute
more patches than Conical, as until today, I'd only actually heard of
one of them.