From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org ([69.77.167.62] helo=lists.gentoo.org) by finch.gentoo.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1LTDw9-0000WF-RX for garchives@archives.gentoo.org; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 11:22:57 +0000 Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 8F4AFE02BF; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 11:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from india533.server4you.de (india533.server4you.de [85.25.151.41]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 63D89E02BF for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 11:22:56 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [192.168.0.17] (pD95FE3BB.dip.t-dialin.net [217.95.227.187]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by india533.server4you.de (Postfix) with ESMTP id 6226C770622 for ; Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:22:55 +0100 (CET) Message-ID: <49843490.1010604@smash-net.org> Date: Sat, 31 Jan 2009 12:22:56 +0100 From: =?UTF-8?B?Tm9ybWFuIFJpZcOf?= User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.19 (X11/20090104) Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org MIME-Version: 1.0 To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] Re: homemade nas setup References: <87y6wtlksy.fsf@newsguy.com> <4982EB00.2010309@smash-net.org> <87myd8lk46.fsf@newsguy.com> <498383DA.5070309@smash-net.org> <873af0l6n9.fsf@newsguy.com> In-Reply-To: <873af0l6n9.fsf@newsguy.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-Archives-Salt: acce8636-1458-4b3c-9115-a3b88091f303 X-Archives-Hash: e3f9d174143204c526e95a43f921c410 Harry Putnam schrieb: > Norman Rie=C3=9F writes: > > >> Is it connected into 10/100 or 1000 (gigabit) setup? > =20 > =20 > =20 >> It is a gigabit setup. NFS read is about 30-34MB/s, writing is >> considerably slower with 15MB/s. So writing is a bit slow. But as i do >> not need fast storage i did not investigate. And it must be mentioned, >> that the whole data is in AES. >> =20 > > Being AES should have a pretty dramatic impact right? or is it not > decrypted and just bounced from one place to another? > > =20 Yes AES has some impact. These are the speeds with de/encryption.