From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: Received: from lists.gentoo.org (pigeon.gentoo.org [208.92.234.80]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange X25519 server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by finch.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id C4A8F158232 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 01:53:35 +0000 (UTC) Received: from pigeon.gentoo.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with SMTP id E6465E08DA; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 01:53:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from smarthost01c.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk (smarthost01c.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk [212.23.1.5]) (using TLSv1.3 with cipher TLS_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (256/256 bits) key-exchange ECDHE (prime256v1) server-signature RSA-PSS (4096 bits) server-digest SHA256) (No client certificate requested) by pigeon.gentoo.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0B932E0844 for ; Thu, 5 Dec 2024 01:53:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [82.69.80.10] (helo=cube.localnet) by smarthost01c.sbp.mail.zen.net.uk with esmtpsa (TLS1.3) tls TLS_ECDHE_RSA_WITH_AES_256_GCM_SHA384 (Exim 4.95) (envelope-from ) id 1tJ13M-00CJhX-Eb for gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org; Thu, 05 Dec 2024 01:53:27 +0000 From: Peter Humphrey To: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Subject: Re: [gentoo-user] NFS mounting - SOLVED Date: Thu, 05 Dec 2024 01:53:27 +0000 Message-ID: <4942673.GXAFRqVoOG@cube> In-Reply-To: <10573703.nUPlyArG6x@rogueboard> References: <1910258.tdWV9SEqCh@cube> <10573703.nUPlyArG6x@rogueboard> Precedence: bulk List-Post: List-Help: List-Unsubscribe: List-Subscribe: List-Id: Gentoo Linux mail X-BeenThere: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org Reply-to: gentoo-user@lists.gentoo.org X-Auto-Response-Suppress: DR, RN, NRN, OOF, AutoReply MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" X-Originating-smarthost01c-IP: [82.69.80.10] Feedback-ID: 82.69.80.10 X-Archives-Salt: f03e7dd2-78b6-4f78-96a6-59d0700e13c6 X-Archives-Hash: 5fbe14b911ff97af821f2bcc6677526f On Monday 2 December 2024 17:56:38 GMT Michael wrote: > On Tuesday 26 November 2024 16:13:01 GMT Peter Humphrey wrote: > > Greetings, > > > > [New readers start here... :) ] > > > > I've spent several days-worth of my time over the last few weeks in trying > > to get my i5 box to export its portage tree and packages directory to a > > chroot on my M9 machine. I read all the docs, I thought about the help > > that > > was offered here, I changed file systems and partitions around - > > everything > > I could think of. > > > > The answer was simple, and I stumbled over it in a post on Stack Exchange: > > the behaviour of NFS mount calls changed in NFS v4. I didn't need to > > change > > /etc/ exports on the i5, but the NFS-mount call on the M9 did need to > > change. > > Can you please share the link? https://unix.stackexchange.com/questions/388410/nfs-mount-failed-reason-given-by-server-no-such-file-or-directory It's comment 15. I found this after I gave up running ~amd64 and reverted to a backup from 12 days ago. -- Regards, Peter.